《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊（遴选）数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
外科研究与新技术（中英文）

外科研究与新技术 ›› 2019, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 194-196.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2019.03.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种材料充填方法对儿童后牙牙体缺损咀嚼功能的影响

张传红   

  1. 宁波市鄞州区明楼街道社区卫生服务中心口腔科,鄞州 315400
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-22 出版日期:2019-09-28 发布日期:2019-12-05
  • 作者简介:张传红(1984—),女,本科,主治医师,从事口腔科疾病的诊断与治疗;电子信箱:yv6990@163.com

Effects of two filling methods on masticatory function in children with posterior teeth defects

ZHANG Chuanhong   

  1. Department of Dental, Ningbo Yinzhou District Minglou Street Community Health Service Center, Yinzhou 315400, China
  • Received:2019-05-22 Online:2019-09-28 Published:2019-12-05

PDF (PC)

308

摘要： 目的 探讨复合树脂与玻璃离子体水门汀填充法对后牙牙体缺损患者咀嚼功能的影响。方法 选择2017年5月—2018年4月接收的72例后牙牙体缺损患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,各36例。对照组采用玻璃离子体水门汀进行后牙牙体缺损充填治疗,观察组采用复合树脂进行后牙牙体缺损充填治疗,对比两组后牙牙体缺损充填后的修复效果和咀嚼功能。结果 对照组治疗总有效率为75.00%,低于观察组的94.44%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);治疗前两组咀嚼功能相比,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);治疗1年后对照组咀嚼频率低于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 复合树脂充填后牙牙体缺损效果更佳,咀嚼功能强且操作简单,且不良反应少,值得临床广泛使用。

关键词: 后牙牙体缺损, 复合树脂, 玻璃离子体水门汀, 咀嚼功能

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of composite resin and glass ionomer cements filling Methods on masticatory function in patients with posterior teeth defects.Methods A total of 72 patients with posterior teeth defects in our hospital from May 2017 to April 2018 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 36 cases in each group.The control group was treated by glass ionomer cements filling method, and the observation group was treated by composite resin filling method.The repair effect and masticatory function after posterior tooth defect filling were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the control group (75.00%) was lower than that of the observation group (94.44%) (P<0.05).Before treatment, there was no statistical difference in masticatory function between the two groups (P>0.05).After treatment for one year, the masticatory frequency of the control group was lower than that of the observation group (P<0.05); the adverse reaction rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Composite resin filling for posterior teeth defect has better effects than glass ionomer cements filling, as it can enhance masticatory function and is easy to operate with less adeverse reactions; therefore, it is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Posterior teeth defects, composite resin, glass-ionomer cement, masticatory function

中图分类号: