网络远程胎心监护系统的临床应用分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2021.02.017

外科研究与新技术 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2): 138-142.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2021.02.017

网络远程胎心监护系统的临床应用分析

吴彩萍¹, 阮辉¹, 顾华英²

1.上海市金山区亭林医院设备科,上海 201505;
2.上海市金山区亭林医院妇产科,上海 201505

收稿日期:2020-09-29 出版日期:2021-06-28 发布日期:2022-08-22
作者简介:吴彩萍（1976—）,女,大学本科,主管护师,从事设备管理工作;电子信箱：tywucaiping_ok@126.com

Clinical application of networked remote fetal heart monitoring system

WU Caiping¹, RUAN Hui¹, GU Huaying²

1. Department of Equipment, Tinglin Hospital, Jinshan District, Shanghai 201505, China;
2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tinglin Hospital, Jinshan District, Shanghai 201505, China

Received:2020-09-29 Online:2021-06-28 Published:2022-08-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的在妊娠晚期孕妇中使用网络远程电子胎心监护（electronic fetal monitoring, EFM）系统,并与传统EFM进行比较,分析其对于妊娠结局的改善效果。方法研究对象为2019年1月—2020年1月收治的妊娠晚期孕妇298例;依据术后治疗方法分为两组,传统组孕妇采用常规EFM检查（142例）,网络组孕妇采用网络远程EFM检查（156例）。观察指标包括两组孕妇妊娠晚期胎儿管理指标、妊娠期间不良心理状态评分、最终分娩方式及胎儿妊娠结局。结果网络组孕妇的胎心、胎动、无应激实验（non-stress test, NST）异常检出率均明显优于传统组（P<0.05）。干预后,两组孕妇的焦虑、抑郁等不良心理状态评分均获得明显改善;网络组孕妇的焦虑、抑郁等不良心理状态评分均明显低于传统组（P<0.05）。两组孕妇的顺产、助产及剖宫产等分娩方式的占比差异较小（P>0.05）。网络组孕妇的早产、新生儿窒息、羊水污染及体质量过低等不良妊娠结局发生率均明显低于传统组（P<0.05）。结论网络远程EFM系统具有简便、安全、高效的应用优势,孕妇接受程度高,存在较高的敏感性、准确性及时效性,有利于突破传统时间与空间的限制、节约医患双方的时间与精力,更大程度地降低诊治压力、优化医疗资源的配置。因此,建议依据实际情况优先选择网络远程EFM以达到规避胎儿缺氧的发生、改善妊娠质量的效果。

关键词: 妊娠晚期, 网络技术, 远程电子胎心监护, 无应激实验, 妊娠结局

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of networked remote electronic fetal monitoring （EFM） and traditional EFM in the late stage of pregnancy on the outcome of pregnancy. Methods The study subjects were 298 pregnant women of late pregnancy admitted from January 2019 to January 2020. According to postoperative treatment method, they were divided into two groups： a traditional group who received conventional EFM examination （142 cases） and a network group who received networked remote EFM examination （156 cases）. Fetal management during late pregnancy, adverse psychological status score during pregnancy, final mode of delivery, and pregnancy outcome were compared between the two groups. Results The abnormal rates of fetal heart, fetal movement, and non-stress test （NST） results were significantly lower in the network group than those in the traditional group （P<0.05）. After the intervention, both groups of pregnant women showed significant improvement in anxiety and depression scores; the network group showed significantly lower anxiety and depression scores than the traditional group （P<0.05）. No differences were found in the distribution of normal, assisted, and caesarean deliveries between the two groups of pregnant women （P>0.05）. The incidence rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as premature birth, neonatal asphyxia, amniotic fluid contamination, and low body weight were significantly lower in the network group than those in the traditional group （P<0.05）. Conclusion The networked remote EFM system has the advantages of simple, safe, and efficient application, high acceptance by pregnant women, as well as high sensitivity, accuracy and timeliness, which is conducive to breaking the traditional time and space limitation, saving time and energy of both doctors and patients, reducing the pressure of diagnosis and treatment, and optimizing the allocation of medical resources to a greater extent. Therefore, it is recommended to prioritize networked remote EFM in order to avoid fetal hypoxia and improve the quality of pregnancy.

Key words: Late pregnancy, Network technology, Remote electronic fetal monitoring, Non-stress test, Pregnancy outcome

中图分类号:

R715.7

吴彩萍, 阮辉, 顾华英. 网络远程胎心监护系统的临床应用分析[J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2021, 10(2): 138-142.

WU Caiping, RUAN Hui, GU Huaying. Clinical application of networked remote fetal heart monitoring system[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2021, 10(2): 138-142.

参考文献

[1] Kilowski KA, Robinson B.Strip of the month: does antenatal steroid administration impact electronic fetal monitoring?[J]. Neo Reviews, 2018,19(4):256-264.
[2] Sartwelle TP, Johnston JC, Arda B.Electronic Fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy litigation and bioethics: the evils in Pandora's Box[J]. J Pediatr Health Care, 2016,2(14):1-7.
[3] Heelan F, Shi L, Zhang Y, et al.Impact of continuous electronic fetal monitoring on birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancies[J]. Birth, 2019, 6(12):326-329.
[4] Mullins E, Lees C, Brocklehurst P.Is continuous electronic fetal monitoring useful for all women in labour?[J]. BMJ, 2017,35(9):5423.
[5] 何茹碧,吴云涛,缪华章,等.基于互联网的移动远程胎心监护的实现和一致性评价[J].中国妇幼卫生杂志,2016,3(1):5-7.
[6] Taylor R, Friedman P, Kim SK, et al.Temporal and quantitative associations of electronic fetal monitoring with outcomes[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2018,13(1):155.
[7] Evans MI, Eden RD, Britt DW, et al.Re-engineering the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring to identify reversible risk for cerebral palsy: a case control series[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2018,7(1):188-191.
[8] Carter EB, Chu CS,Thompson Z,et al.True knot at the time of delivery: electronic fetal monitoring characteristics and neonatal outcomes[J]. J Perinatol, 2018,24(9):665-667.
[9] Yeom GJ, Kim IO.Development and effects of supplementary material about electronic fetal monitoring for nursing students[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2016,22(1):235-257.
[10] Porter AC, Triebwasser JE, Tuuli M, et al.Fetal sex differences in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2016,33(8):786-790.
[11] 蒲杰,张刚,蒋庆源,等.互联网+远程胎心监护临床应用的可行性研究[J].实用妇产科杂志, 2018, 34(3):208-212.
[12] Turnbull TL, Mol B WJ, Matthews G, et al.Does ST analysis have a place in electronic fetal monitoring?[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2016,2(6):167-169.
[13] Carter E, Chu C, Thompson Z, et al.Electronic fetal monitoring and neonatal outcomes when a nuchal cord is present at delivery[J]. Am J Perinatol,2019,2(9):456-459.
[14] Enabudoso E, Ande AA, Enaruna N, et al.Challenges and practical steps to optimizing the utilization of electronic fetal monitoring in low-and medium-income countries: The UBTH experience[J].Trop J Obstet Gynaecol, 2019, 7(6):522-526.
[15] Rosenbloom JI, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG, et al.Elevated umbilical cord arterial lactate at birth and electronic fetal monitoring characteristics on admission and in the active phase[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2019,6(2):356-359.
[16] 贾红知,马玉红,刘欢,等.基于互联网的远程胎儿电子胎心监护在妊娠晚期孕妇中的应用和效果观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科, 2019, 2(8):106-108.
[17] Sartwelle TP, Johnston JC, Arda B, et al.Cerebral palsy, cesarean sections, and electronic fetal monitoring: All the light we cannot see[J].J Clin Ethics,2019,4(3):1-8.
[18] Daglar G, Demirel G, Guler H, et al.The effect of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) education program on EFM interpretation skills[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2019,4(7):152-156.

网络远程胎心监护系统的临床应用分析

Clinical application of networked remote fetal heart monitoring system

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	尹喆, 陈其臻, 傅夏燕, 焦雨帆, 纪亚忠, 王炎秋. 促排卵后卵巢扭转患者继续取卵的临床结局分析[J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2021, 10(3): 162-166.
[2]	陈耘, 闫桂敏, 朱海, 郏晓骏. 硬膜外分娩镇痛对催产素引产孕妇妊娠结局的影响[J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2020, 9(4): 257-259.