《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊

外科研究与新技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4): 280-288.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2023.04.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

椎体成形术联合放疗与单纯放疗治疗脊柱转移瘤的meta分析

曾凌翔1,2, 张景佩3, 原向伟1,4   

  1. 1.广东医科大学研究生学院, 广东 湛江 524000;
    2.江门市新会区人民医院骨科, 广东 江门 529000;
    3.江门市新会区人民医院肿瘤放射治疗中心, 广东 江门 529000;
    4.江门市中心医院脊柱外科, 广东 江门 529000
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-17 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2024-01-17
  • 通讯作者: 原向伟,电子信箱:doctoryuanxw@163.com
  • 作者简介:曾凌翔(1992—),男,硕士研究生在读,住院医师,从事临床脊柱外科工作

Effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with external beam radiation therapy versus external beam radiation therapy alone on spinal metastasis: a meta-analysis

ZENG Lingxiang1,2, ZHANG Jingpei3, YUAN Xiangwei1,4   

  1. 1. Graduate School of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524000, Guangdong, China;
    2. Department of Othopedics, Jiangmen Xinhui People’s Hospital, Jiangmen 529000, Guangdong, China;
    3. Centre of Radiation Oncology, Jiangmen Xinhui People’s Hospital, Jiangmen 529000, Guangdong, China;
    4. Department of Spinal Surgery, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen 529000, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2022-10-17 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2024-01-17

摘要: 目的 通过meta分析评价外照射放疗联合椎体成形术(EBRT plus PVP)对比单纯放疗(EBRT)治疗脊柱转移瘤(spinal metastasis)的疗效差异。方法 计算机检索CNKI、Wanfang Database、CBM、VIP、PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane、Embase、Clinical Trials,搜集所有采用EBRT plus PVP与EBRT治疗脊柱转移瘤的对照研究,检索时限从建立数据库至2022年7月1日。由2名评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用Review Manager 5.4.1软件进行meta分析。结果 共纳入12篇文献,包括1篇随机对照、11篇队列研究,共1138例,meta分析结果显示,EBRT plus PVP组治疗后1 d、1、3、6、12个月视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,总体疼痛缓解有效率,1月、3月脊柱骨转移不稳定评估(SINS)评分,局部进展/复发率,患椎病理性骨折发生率,3个月Karnofsky功能状态评分(KPS)改善率,ECOG体力状态改善率方面优于EBRT组(P<0.05)。在1个月karnofsky功能状态评分(KPS)改善率方面,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 分析显示EBRT Plus PVP比EBRT具有更好的镇痛效果及生活质量,术后病椎稳定性、增强局部抗肿瘤作用等。

关键词: 椎体成形术, 椎体强化术, 放射治疗, 脊柱转移瘤, meta分析

Abstract: Objective To evaluated the effect of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus EBRT alone on spinal metastasis by meta-analysis. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Clinical Trials, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP databases was conducted,and the retrieval period was from inception to July 1st, 2022 to identify the controlled trials of EBRT plus PVP versus EBRT alone for treating patients with spinal metastasis. Two reviewers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies independently. The obtained data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. Results There were 12 studies (1 randomized controlled trials and 11 cohort studies) involving 1138 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 1 d, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, overall pain relief response rate at 1 and 3 months, spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS), local progression/recurrence rate, incidence of spondythopathic fractures, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) improvement rate at 3 months, and ECOG physical status improvement rate were better in the EBRT plus PVP group than in those treated with EBRT alone (P<0.05). No differences in KPS improvement rate at 1 month was observed between the EBRT plus PVP and the EBRT alone groups (P>0.05). Conclusion EBRT plus PVP has a better analgesic effect and produces better quality of life, postoperative vertebral stability, and enhanced local anti-tumor effect than EBRT.

Key words: External beam radiation therapy, Percutaneous vertebroplasty, Radiation therapy, Spinal metastasis, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: