目的 对甲状腺微小癌患者分别采用腔镜下与开放性手术治疗,对比腔镜下与开放性手术治疗的疗效。方法 选取2022年1月—2024年6月行甲状腺微小癌手术的82例患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组(41例,开放手术治疗)和观察组(41例,经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗),对比组间的手术相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量、中央区淋巴结节清扫数目)、治疗效果及安全性等。结果 观察组患者手术时间、中央区淋巴结节清扫数目多于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗前免疫功能指标(CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/ CD8+)对比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后观察组患者CD8+水平较对照组明显降低,其余免疫功能指标水平较对照组明显升高(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后患者和观测者瘢痕评价量表(POSAS)评分和观测者瘢痕评价量表(OSAS)评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 与开放手术治疗比较,对甲状腺微小癌手术患者施行经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺手术治疗,能够改善患者的手术指标和免疫功能,降低患者疼痛程度,优化其瘢痕评分,减少并发症的发生,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of endoscopic and open surgical treatments for patients with thyroid microcarcinoma. Methods A total of 82 patients who underwent thyroid microcarcinoma surgery from January 2022 to June 2024 were selected and randomly divided into two groups by random number table method. The control group (41 cases) received open surgery treatment, while the observation group (41 cases) underwent thyroid surgery through the transthoracic approach using laparoscopic techniques. The surgical indicators (operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and number of central lymph nodes dissection), treatment effects, and safety between the two groups were compared. Results The operative time and number of central lymph nodes dissection of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, while the intraoperative blood loss was less (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in immune function indicators (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+) between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). However, after treatment, the CD8+ was lower and the other immune function indicators were higher in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The scores of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) in the observation group were higher than those in the control group after treatment (P<0.05). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with open surgery, transthoracic endoscopic thyroid surgery for patients with thyroid microcarcinoma could improve surgical indicators and immune function, alleviate pain, optimize scar scores, and reduce the occurrence of complications. This approach merits further clinical promotion.
[1] 刘三保,王亚兵,任俊玲. 3种不同入路腔镜手术治疗甲状腺微小癌的疗效及并发症对比研究[J]. 重庆医科大学学报,2024,49(1):65-69.
[2] 彭程程,张雅琪. 无充气经腋窝入路腔镜手术治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的临床疗效及对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2024,18(4):442-444.
[3] 朱超,金功圣,金鑫,等. 经全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺手术治疗早期分化型甲状腺癌的临床疗效研究[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报,2024,49(8):1010-1014.
[4] 王阳,袁天白,张海玉,等. 改良全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺手术在治疗微小乳头状甲状腺癌中的临床应用研究[J]. 当代医药论丛,2024,22(12):57-59.
[5] 洪礼钊,吴皖肖,冯嘉伟,等. 经口入路与经胸入路腔镜手术治疗单侧甲状腺癌的疗效比较[J]. 中国研究型医院,2024,11(4):25-28.
[6] 张洪伟,贾高磊. 全乳晕入路腔镜手术在单侧甲状腺微小乳头状癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中国当代医药,2024,31(8):76-79.
[7] 秦向阳. 乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺切除术与开放性甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺癌患者的效果比较[J]. 中国民康医学,2024,36(6):139-141.
[8] 武欣欣,彭显更. 完全腔镜甲状腺癌根治术联合纳米炭与传统开放性甲状腺癌根治术的临床应用效果对比[J]. 中国实用医药,2024,19(14):39-42.
[9] 郭湃,张浩,张云生,等. 腋窝入路无充气腔镜手术与开放性甲状腺癌根治术对甲状腺癌患者颈部功能的影响分析[J]. 中国实用医药,2024,19(4):53-56.
[10] 黄文技. 开放性甲状腺手术与腔镜下甲状腺手术的临床疗效比较[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)医药卫生,2024(9):40-42.
[11] 苏峥,任海朋,依荷芭丽·迟. 调节性T细胞与肿瘤免疫治疗的研究进展[J]. 癌症进展,2023,21(8):824-829.
[12] 黄利勇. 胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺癌根治术与开放手术对患者创伤应激因子与CD4+、CD8+水平的影响[J].中外医疗,2024,43(6):33-36.
[13] 宋晓丹,赵北永,刘亦晴. 经胸乳入路腔镜甲状腺乳头状癌切除术的疗效及对甲状旁腺功能的影响[J]. 中国实用医刊,2024,51(11):5-8.
[14] 还勇为,刘金苗,孙波. 全乳晕入路腔镜甲状腺手术与开放手术在甲状腺微小乳头状癌中的比较研究[J]. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2023,7(10):7-9.