《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
护理园地

Medpor填充物经鼻内镜泪阜切口植入治疗眶内壁骨折的围手术期综合性护理

  • 林珊珊 ,
  • 蔡美施 ,
  • 郑小敏 ,
  • 庄丽萍
展开
  • 1.联勤保障部队第九一〇医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 福建 泉州 362000;
    2.联勤保障部队第九一〇医院麻醉科, 福建 泉州 362000

收稿日期: 2024-06-28

Perioperative comprehensive nursing of Medpor implant through endoscopic transcaruncular approach for medial orbital fracture

  • LIN Shanshan ,
  • CAI Meishi ,
  • ZHENG Xiaomin ,
  • ZHUANG Liping
Expand
  • 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery,910 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China;
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, 910 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China

Received date: 2024-06-28

摘要

目的 探究高密度多孔聚乙烯(Medpor)填充物经鼻内镜泪阜切口植入治疗眶内壁骨折的围手术期综合性护理干预的临床应用价值。方法 选取2021年1月—2024年1月收治的眶内壁骨折伴眼球内陷及复视的患者17例,经影像学确定骨折范围及软组织损伤程度后于全身麻醉下经鼻内镜下做泪阜切口,将凹陷的眶内容物还纳至眶内,并植入Medpor填充物修补骨折部位,评价手术后治疗结果;围手术期配合综合性护理干预,比较护理前后患者焦虑、抑郁及生活质量评分,记录患者对护理的满意度。结果 手术后患者复视、双眼突出度差值、眼球运动分级及最佳矫正视力均较手术前明显改善(P<0.05),治疗有效率为94.12%。所有患者顺利完成手术,随访期间未出现感染、填充物移位以及排斥反应等并发症。手术后3个月,患者结膜组织水肿和眼睑水肿比例均较手术后1周明显降低(P<0.05)。围手术期配合综合性护理干预后,患者SAS评分和SDS评分均较干预前明显降低(P<0.05),生活质量评分较干预前明显升高(P<0.05),患者对护理的满意率为88.24%。结论 Medpor填充物经鼻内镜泪阜切口植入治疗眶内壁骨折效果显著,手术成功率高,并发症发生率低。围手术期配合综合性护理干预能够改善患者焦虑、抑郁情绪,提高生活质量,值得临床推广。

本文引用格式

林珊珊 , 蔡美施 , 郑小敏 , 庄丽萍 . Medpor填充物经鼻内镜泪阜切口植入治疗眶内壁骨折的围手术期综合性护理[J]. 外科研究与新技术(中英文), 2025 , 14(2) : 190 -194 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2025.02.021

Abstract

Objective To explore the perioperative comprehensive nursing of porous high-density polyethylene(Medpor) implant through endoscopic transcaruncular approach in the treatment of medial orbital fracture. Methods A total of 17 patients with medial orbital fracture accompanied by enophthalmos and diplopia admitted from January 2021 to January 2024 were selected. After determining the fracture scope and soft tissue injury degree by imaging, an endoscopic transcaruncular approach was used under general anesthesia to restore depressed orbital contents into the orbit and reconstruct the fracture site by Medpor implant. The postoperative outcomes were evaluated. In the perioperative period, after comprehensive nursing intervention was implemented, patients' anxiety, depression, and life quality scores were compared before and after nursing, and patients' satisfaction with nursing was recorded. Results After operation, diplopia, binocular prominence difference, eye movement grade, and best corrected visual acuity were all significantly improved than those before (P<0.05), and the treatment effective rate was 94.12%. All patients successfully completed the operation, and no complications such as infection, displacement of implant, or rejection occurred during the follow-up period. The proportions of patients with conjunctival tissue edema and eyelid edema at 3 months after operation were significantly lower than those at 1 week after operation (P<0.05). After comprehensive nursing intervention in the perioperative period, the SAS score and SDS score of patients after nursing were significantly lower than before (P<0.05), the quality of life score was significantly higher than before (P<0.05), and the nursing satisfaction rate was 88.24%. Conclusion Medpor implant through endoscopic transcaruncular approach is effective in the treatment of medial orbital fracture, with high surgical success rate and rare complications. Perioperative comprehensive nursing intervention can relieve patients' anxiety and depression and improve the quality of life, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

参考文献

[1] Alafaleq M, Roul-Yvonnet F, Schouman T, et al.A retrospective study of pure medial orbital wall fracture management[J]. J Fr Ophtalmol, 2019, 42(6): 592-596.
[2] Cha HG, Nam SM, Kim YB, et al.A comparative study of porous polyethylene versus absorbable polydextro- and polylevolactic-lactide plate in reconstruction of isolated medial orbital wall fracture[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2022, 75(2): 782-787.
[3] Crozet A, Lebranchu P, Vabre B, et al.Management of orbital floor fractures in France: results of a national online survey[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 124(3): 101389.
[4] Pitak-Arnnop P, Witohendro LK, Tangmanee C, et al.Assessing effectiveness of endoscope-assisted medial orbital wall fracture repair vs. no surgery using benefit-risk metrics and literature review[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 124(1): 101267.
[5] Kim DH, Kim NR, Ko HS, et al.Barotraumatic blow-out fracture of the medial orbital wall by nose blowing[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2021, 32(3): e265-e266.
[6] Tedaldi M, Vetrano S, Zotos G, et al.Management of orbital medial wall fracture with endonasal balloon[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2023, 34(3): 1076-1077.
[7] Husain Q, Banks C, Bleier BS.Lynch vs transcaruncular approach: optimizing access to the lateral frontal sinus[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2020, 10(8): 991-995.
[8] Chang M, Yang SW, Park JH, et al.Using the endoscopic transconjunctival and transcaruncular approach to repair combined orbital floor and medial wall blowout fractures[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2017, 28(4): 963-966.
[9] Chiu SJ, Tan JHY, Currie ZI.To implant or not to implant: emergency orbital eviscerations with primary orbital implants[J]. Eye (Lond), 2021, 35(11): 3077-3086.
[10] Pyo SB, Song JK, Ju HS, et al.Reconstruction of large orbital floor defect caused by maxillary sinus mucocele[J].Arch Craniofac Surg, 2017, 18(3): 197-201.
[11] Roslinah M, Wan Hitam WH, Md Salleh MS, et al.Comparison of clinical results and pathological examinations between locally synthesized bone-derived hydroxyapatite and Medpor® orbital implants in animal models[J]. Cureus, 2019, 11(1): e3954.
[12] 赵延祥. 鼻内镜下经筛窦治疗右眼眶内侧壁骨折伴内直肌嵌顿1例[J].实用医药杂志,2019,36(3):253-254.
文章导航

/