目的 探讨两种手术方式治疗三度直肠脱垂的临床效果。方法 分析分别用两种手术方式治疗的30例三度直肠脱垂患者的临床资料。结果 治疗组的手术方式在治愈率和复发率方面与对照组无差异，但在手术时间、术中出血量、术后大出血概率方面明显优于对照组。结论 治疗组方法不但保证了治疗效果而且更为简单方便，术后不会出现大出血，安全性更高，值得推广。

Objective To investigate the two kinds of surgical treatment of rectal prolapse three degrees of clinical effect. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data were used in two of 30 cases of surgical treatment of third-degree rectal prolapse patients. Results The surgical treatment group and the control group, no significant difference in cure rate and relapse rate, but in the operative time, blood loss, postoperative bleeding probability significantly better than the control group. Conclusion The method not only ensures that the treatment group and the treatment effect is more simple and convenient, postoperative bleeding does not occur, more secure, worthy of promotion.