《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
论著

选择性痔上粘膜切除钉合术(TST)治疗痔病的临床疗效观察

  • 郭颂铭
展开
  • 同济医院

收稿日期: 2015-04-16

  修回日期: 2015-04-23

  网络出版日期: 2015-04-01

Clinieal study on using Tissue-selecting TheraPy stapler to Treatment of Hemorrhoid disease

Expand

Received date: 2015-04-16

  Revised date: 2015-04-23

  Online published: 2015-04-01

摘要

[摘要] 目的 观察选择性痔上粘膜切除钉合术(TST)治疗痔病的临床疗效。方法选择198例Ⅲ∽Ⅳ痔病病人,随机分为2组,治疗组108人采用TST治疗,对照组90人采用传统的外剥内扎治疗。观察两组患者术中出血及术后出血症状的疗效以及手术持续时间、住院时间、费用、手术副作用(肛门疼痛、肛门水肿、尿潴留)等情况进行统计学分析比较。结果 治疗组住院时间、费用、手术时间、术中出血量、肛门狭窄疼痛、水肿发生率与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论TST 手术治疗痔病是一种疗效满意而且愈合恢复更快的新术式,有效地保护了肛垫,是安全可靠的术式,具有操作简单、手术时间短、住院时间短,并发症少等优点,值得进一步推广。

关键词: TST; 外剥内扎;

本文引用格式

郭颂铭 . 选择性痔上粘膜切除钉合术(TST)治疗痔病的临床疗效观察[J]. 外科研究与新技术(中英文), 2015 , 4(1) : 12 -14 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2015.01.004

Abstract

[Abstract] Objective To observe and evaluate the selective hemorrhoid studs of mucosal resection combined surgery(TST)the clinical curative effect of treating hemorrhoids sickness. Methods 198 patients with Ⅲ∽Ⅳdegree hemorrhoids,were evenly randomized to TST(treatment group)and Milligan-Morgan(M-M) haemorrhoidectomy (control group) respectively.Operation time,blood loss at surgery,post-operative cure rate of prolapse and bleeding were compared.significant postoperative anal pain,incontinence anal stenosis, and length of stay. Results The operating and wound healing times and hospital stays were and respectively in TST group,all significantly shorter than in Milligan—Morgan group(P<0.01).We observe the treatment effect about the intraoperative stretch reflex feelings and the intraoperative and postoperative haemorrhage, and surgery side effects including anal ache, oedem, uroschesis and postoperative anal function. While there was significant difference in both. Conclusions As compared with the traditional Milligan-Morgan operation.TST is a safe and effective procedure for Ⅲ and IV degree hemorrhoids.The disease recover faster. It has any advantages of simple about operation, short times about operation and hosptial and less complications, so the technique is worth recommending.

参考文献

参考文献
[1] Lin HC,Ren DL,He QL. Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ prolapsing hemorrhoids:a two-year prospective controlled study[J].Techniques in Coloproctology,2012,(05):337-343.
[2] 余智涛,温圣荣,王悦辉.TST与PPH治疗重度内痔临床疗效对照研究[J]. 结直肠肛门外科,2013, 19(3):1001-9448.
[3] 中华医学会外科学分会结直肠肛门外科学组,中华中医药学会肛肠病专业委员会,中国中西医结合学会结直肠肛门病专业委员会,痔临床诊治指南(2006版) [J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(9):461—463.
[4] 王永强,李丽梅.选择性痔上黏膜切除钉合术治疗脱垂性痔病的临床研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2012,16(17):84-86.
[5] 林宏城,任东林,谢尚奎. 选择性痔上黏膜切除钉合术与痔上黏膜环切钉合术的对比研究[J].广东医学,2011,(11):1457-1460.
[6] 冯涛,裴一爽,杨勇等.开环式微创吻合术(TST)治疗混合痔77例临床分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2012,14(6):53-54.
[7] 成川江,王启,吴韬. TST手术治疗痔病的临床疗效观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2010,19(4):240-242.
[8] 姚劲斌,罗湛滨.选择性痔上黏膜切除钉合术治疗环状混合痔[J].广东医学,2012,33(17):2571.
[9] 杨权光.吻合器痔上黏膜钉合术治疗环状脱垂性痔的临床效果观察[J].中国医学创新,2012,9(10):40-41.
[10] 马翔,陈小岚,盛光.开环式微创肛肠吻合器痔切闭术治疗脱垂性痔病的临床研究[J].现代临床外科,2011,11(6):436-437.
[11] 万廷军.PPH在重度痔疮患者中的疗效分析[J].中国医学创新,2013,10(5):58-59.
文章导航

/