[摘要] 目的 对比评价一期根治术与切开引流术治疗肛周脓肿的临床效果。方法 回顾性总结84例肛周脓肿住院患者,分别行一期根治术(治疗组,n=44)和切开引流术(治疗组,n=40),比较术后疗效。结果 与对照组相比,治疗组患者术后脓肿复发率、形成肛瘘的发生率、创面愈合时间明显低于对照组(p<0.001)。两组术后均未发生肛门失禁、肛门狭窄及肛门畸形等,随访1年,肛门功能均正常。结论 一期根治术治疗肛周脓肿手术一次成功,明显降低了脓肿的复发率和肛瘘的发生率,既缩短了疗程,又减轻了患者的痛苦和经济负担,是目前治疗肛周脓肿比较理想的方法。
[Abstract] Objective To evaluate the clinical effect between primary radical operation and incision and drainage of the treatment on crissum abscess.Methods 84 cases of crissum abscess were randomly divided into treatment group (n=44) and control group (n=40). Patients in treatment group were received primary radical operation, patients in control group were only treated by incision and drainage. Results Compared with the control group, treatment group patients postoperative abscess recurrence rate forming the incidence of anal fistula, wound healing time significantly lower than the control group obviously(p<0.001).Two groups were anal incontinence, anal stenosis and postoperative anal malformation, etc., were followed up for 1 year, anus function are normal.Conclusions It is suggested that primary radical operation can be primarily performed,lower the abscess recurrence and anal fistula incidence,which not only shorten treatment course,but also reduce pain of patients.Primary radical operation is a good method of crissum abscess therapy.
[1].
[2]莫少卫,林友彬.例肛门脓肿一次性治愈率效果分析[J].中国现代医生, 2009, 47(22):154-155
[3]张弘.一次性手术根治肛门脓肿的体会[J].[J].中国中医药现代远程教育, 2010, (18):69-
[4]吴彬,丁敏,徐伟等.超声引导下高位肛门脓肿隧道拖线引流术的临床研究[J].河北中医药学报, 2015, 30(3):10-15
[5]国家中医药管理局.中医病症诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1994:132-133.
[6]范廷良.中医手术疗法治疗肛门脓肿138例[J][J].江苏中医药, 2012, 44(9):47-48
[7]李华山.陈琴.肛管直肠周围脓肿的手术治疗研究进展[J].世界华人消化杂志, 2012, 20(7):580-584
[8]刘国华.一期手术治疗肛门直肠周围急性脓肿[J].中国肛肠病杂志, 2001, 21(5):36-37
[9]陈家海.一次性根治术治疗肛周脓肿 例体会[J].重庆医学, 2008, 37(15):1669-
[10]覃建雄, 黄桂平.农伟.根治性治疗肛周脓肿失败 例分析[J].中国现代医药杂志, 2008, 2(10):85-
[11]赵建芬, 王雪华.叶敏等.不同坐浴时间对肛周脓肿术后创面愈合的影响[J].护理研究, 2013, 3(3):827-828