目的 探究临床治疗腰椎退行性疾病患者的过程中,对比应用微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术与传统后路开放手术的临床效果,为临床腰椎疾病治疗奠定基础。方法 2016年1月—2017年2月期间收治的64例退行性腰椎关节源性腰痛患者,对比患者应用不同治疗措施进行治疗并观察临床效果。结果 研究组予以微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术治疗的患者的切口长度、术后引流量及住院时间等手术完成情况、VAS评分、ODI评分均显著优于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在临床治疗腰椎退行性疾病患者的过程中,可用微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术可显著提升手术完成情况,有利于各项评分的改善,可广泛推广。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of minimally invasive transforaminal decompression of lumbar fusion with internal fixation and conventional posterior open surgery on lumbar degenerative diseases,and provide a basis for treatment of clinical lumbar diseases.Methods From January 2016 to January 2017,a total of 64 cases of degenerative lumbar joint discogenic back pain were recruited to observe the clinical effects of different treatments.Results The patients who had minimally invasive transforaminal decompression of lumbar fusion with internal fixation showed better results of length of incision,postoperative drainage volume,hospital stay,VAS score,and ODI score than those who had conventional surgery,and the differences were significant (P<0.05).Conclusion For lumbar degenerative diseases,minimally invasive transforaminal decompression of lumbar fusion with internal fixation can significantly improve operation completion and various postoperative scores,and is worth promoting.
[1] 黎庆初,尹刚辉,张忠民,等.微创Wiltse入路与传统后正中入路手术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2012,22(9):812-817.
[2] 李懿,詹友达,李洪兵,等.微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术与传统后路开放手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的对比研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2015,19(5):67-70.
[3] 马宁,袁锋.加长型Philos锁定板治疗肱骨近端骨折伴同侧肱骨干骨折[J].外科研究与新技术,2012,1 (3):112-114.
[4] 陈云生,陈荣春,郭朝阳,等.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗老年腰椎退变性疾病[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2013,23(12):1079.
[5] 毛克亚,王岩,肖嵩华,等.单侧微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用椎弓根螺钉结合经椎板关节突螺钉混合内固定可行性研究[J].中华外科杂志,2012,49(12):1067.
[6] 王建.对微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术的几点认识[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2013,23(9):769-770.
[7] 闫国良,纪振钢,高浩然,等.微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术与传统后路开放手术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2013,23(3):244.
[8] 蒋波,袁锋.复杂股骨远端骨折的治疗[J].外科研究与新技术,2014,3(1):69-73.