《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
论著

电切术与电灼术治疗女性腺性膀胱炎的效果分析

  • 顾擎 ,
  • 赵晳萍 ,
  • 王锡智
展开
  • 1.苏州九龙医院泌尿外科,苏州 215016;
    2.苏州九龙医院妇产科,苏州 215016
顾 擎(1982—),男,硕士,主治医生,从事泌尿外科临床工作

收稿日期: 2018-08-21

  网络出版日期: 2019-12-16

Efficacy comparison of electro-resection and electro- fulguration for cystitis glandularis in female

  • GU Qing ,
  • ZHAO Xiping ,
  • WANG Xizhi
Expand
  • 1.Department of Urology Surgery, Suzhou Jiulong Hospital, Suzhou 215016, China;
    2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Suzhou Jiulong Hospital, Suzhou 215016, China

Received date: 2018-08-21

  Online published: 2019-12-16

摘要

目的 探讨经尿道电切术与电灼术治疗女性腺性膀胱炎的疗效差异。方法 选取住院治疗的女性腺性膀胱炎患者作为观察对象,其中42例行经尿道电灼术治疗(对照组),70例行经尿道电切术治疗(观察组),比较两组患者术后随访情况及疗效的差异。 结果 两组在手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、留置尿管时间的比较中,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后24 h排尿次数及尿急次数较术前均下降(P<0.05),其中观察组较对照组术后24 h排尿次数及尿急次数更低(P<0.05)。两组患者术后总有效率无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。但观察组患者术后治愈率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。电灼组患者术后1个月内症状缓解率较电切组缓解率高,但电切组术后半年症状总缓解率较电灼组高(P<0.05)。两组患者术前Survivin、P53水平比较无显著差异,各组术后阳性率较术前均下降(P<0.05),其中观察组较对照组术后Survivin、P53水平更低(P<0.05)。结论 对于女性腺性膀胱炎而言,采取经尿道电切术治疗效果更好,值得临床上进一步推广。

本文引用格式

顾擎 , 赵晳萍 , 王锡智 . 电切术与电灼术治疗女性腺性膀胱炎的效果分析[J]. 外科研究与新技术(中英文), 2018 , 7(3) : 187 -190 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2018.03.010

Abstract

Objective To investigate the difference of curative effect between electro-resection and electro-fulguration on female cystitis glandularis.Methods Female glandular cystitis patients who were hospitalized in Suzhou Jiulong Hospital were selected, including 42 patients undergoing transurethral electro-fulguration (control group) and 70 patients undergoing transurethral electro-resection (observation group).Postoperative follow-up data and differences in efficacy were compared.Results There were no significant differences in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and indwelling catheter time between the two groups (P>0.05).The number of urination and urinary urgency at 24 h after operation were lower than those before operation (P<0.05), and the number of urination and urinary urgency were lower in the observation group than those in the control group at 24 h after operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05).However, the postoperative cure rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).In the electro-fulguration group, the symptom remission rate was higher than that in the electro-resection group within 1 month after surgery.However, the total remission rate of the resection group was higher in the electro-fulguration group (P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the levels of Survivin and P53 between the two groups before operation.The postoperative positive rate in each group was lower than that before surgery (P<0.05).The levels of Survivin and P53 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion For female cystitis glandularis, transurethral electro-resection is better and worthy of further clinical promotion.

参考文献

[1] 谢进东,陈烈钳,岳巍巍,等.经尿道膀胱黏膜电切术联合膀胱化疗药物治疗腺性膀胱炎的疗效观察[J].中国癌症防治杂志, 2017,9(2):149-152.
[2] 高峰.两种手术方法治疗女性腺性膀胱炎效果研究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017,17(54):129.
[3] 李小辉,魏澎涛,韩兴涛,等.经尿道膀胱黏膜电切术与膀胱颈电切术治疗腺性膀胱炎的临床观察[J].中国继续医学教育, 2016,8(12):100-101.
[4] 刘政江,黄明亮,苟举民.腺性膀胱炎97例诊断与治疗体会[J].实用医药杂志, 2016,33(10):886-887.
[5] 罗博,赵小洲,陆林本,等.2μm激光气化切除术与电切术治疗腺性膀胱炎的临床疗效[J].中国激光医学杂志, 2014,23(5):257.
[6] 周峰,汪超军,刘犇,等.经尿道等离子电切术治疗女性腺性膀胱炎(附97例报告)[J].微创泌尿外科杂志, 2014,3(4):227-229.
[7] 赖必南,陈启富,李涛,等.经尿道电切和电灼术治疗女性腺性膀胱炎的疗效比较[J].福建医药杂志, 2013,35(6):105-107.
[8] 宋亚辉,李鹏程,廖然,等.Survivin 在腺性膀胱炎与膀胱腺癌中的表达及临床意义[J].华夏医学, 2014,27(5):16-19.
[9] 李利军.耳针联合八正散及丝裂霉素膀胱灌注治疗腺性膀胱炎效果及对血清Survivin、p53水平的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志, 2018,27(18):1968-1971.
文章导航

/