目的 对比观察改良LIFT术式治疗肛瘘的临床疗效。方法 将100例接受手术治疗的肛瘘患者分为对照组和观察组,每组50例;对照组接受传统手术方式治疗,观察组采用改良LIFT术治疗,回顾性分析比较两组患者的临床疗效、术后肛门功能、并发症。结果 观察组治疗总有效率高于对照组(98.00% 对 82.00%,P<0.05),术后1、2个月肛门功能改善优于对照组(P<0.05),并发症发生率低于对照组(2.00% 对26.00%,P<0.05)。结论 与传统手术方式相比,改良LIFT术式治疗肛瘘效果显著,改善患者术后肛门功能,降低并发症发生风险,值得临床推广。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical effects of modified LIFT on anal fistula. Methods One hundred anal fistula patients receiving surgical treatment were divided into a control group and an observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received traditional surgical treatment, while the observation group received modified LIFT surgery. The clinical efficacy, postoperative anal function, and complications of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (98.00% vs. 82.00%, P<0.05), the anal function 1 and 2 months after surgery was better (P<0.05), and the incidence rate of complications was lower (2.00% vs. 26.00%, P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional surgical method, the modified LIFT surgery has a significant effect on anal fistula with improved postoperative anal function and reduced risks of complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
[1] 赵云,肖维,高哲.改良LIFT治疗复杂性肛瘘的临床疗效研究[J].中国现代医学杂志,2018,28(2):78-81.
[2] 高昆. 改良LIFT术与切开挂线引流术治疗复杂性肛瘘的临床比较[J].西南国防医药,2018,28(4):321-323.
[3] 王悦辉,曾勇波,罗绍杰.改良LIFT术治疗中青年复杂性肛瘘的临床效果研究[J].结直肠肛门外科,2018,24(2):145-148.
[4] 盛尹菁. 传统手术方式和改良LIFT术式治疗肛瘘的临床疗效及肛门功能分析[J].泰山医学院学报,2018,39(10):1163-1164.
[5] 张辉,应光耀,高洪娣,等.内口结扎改良LIFT术治疗低位肛瘘的临床研究[J].中国中医急症,2017,26(2):292-294.
[6] 黄宏伟,陈志伟.改良LIFT术治疗高位肛瘘的临床研究[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(2):85-87.
[7] 李朋桧. 改良LIFT术治疗高位肛瘘的临床效果分析[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(15):2809.
[8] 凌艳霞. 改良LIFT术治疗肛瘘的疗效研究[J].中医临床研究,2017,9(21):79-80.