目的 对比分析经腹腹膜前（transabdominal preperitoneal, TAPP）疝修补术与开放网塞加平片无张力疝修补术（open mesh plug and flat plate tension-free hernia repair, Rutkow）治疗腹股沟疝的疗效。方法 将收治的100例腹股沟疝患者随机分成对照组与观察组,每组各50例。对照组接受Rutkow手术,观察组接受腔镜TAPP疝修补术对比两组的疗效。结果 观察组的并发症（包括切口感染、复发、血清肿、尿潴留以及睾丸疼痛）明显少于对照组（6%对26%,P<0.05）。结论 TAPP治疗腹股沟疝,手术风险和并发症较少,康复快,值得应用。
Objective To comparatively analyze transabdominal preperitioneal hernia （TAPP） repair and open mesh plug and flat plate tension-free hernia repair （Rutkow） on inguinal hernia. Methods A total of 100 patients with inguinal hernia were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group with 50 patients in each group. The control group received Rutkow surgery and the observation group received endoscopic TAPP surgery to compare the efficacy of the two groups. Results Complications including incision infection, recurrence, seroma, urinary retention, and testicular pain in the observation group were less than those in the control group （6% vs. 26%, P<0.05）. Conclusion TAPP repair for inguinal hernia produces less surgical complications, lower operational risks, and faster recovery, thus it is worthy of application.
[1] 王建平. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患者的疗效及安全性分析[J].中国药物与临床, 2020,20(8):1342-1344.
[2] 吕志强,沈根海,戴玮,等.腹腔镜下完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝:单中心1021例报道[J].临床外科杂志, 2020,28(7):666-668.
[3] 魏寇准,余磊,张卫东,等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝疗效观察[J].皖南医学院学报, 2020,39(3):253-255.
[4] 王燕惠,曾祥鑫,陈锦荣,等.单孔腹腔镜与传统开放手术疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的对比分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020,25(7):512-515.
[5] 王克诚,徐樊,姜飚.传统开放式修补术与腹腔镜无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床应用对比分析[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2020,32(8):66-69.
[6] 张志,刘威,王刚,等.急诊腹腔镜技术在成年人腹股沟嵌顿疝治疗中的应用策略[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020,25(7):505-508.
[7] 陆朝阳,刘嘉铭.育龄期女性腹股沟疝治疗的处理策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020,19(7):738-741.
[8] 立全晰,沈宇,万伟,等.聚丙烯带网塞补片无张力修补腹股沟疝后腹壁力学和疼痛变化[J].中国组织工程研究, 2021,25(4):548-552.
