《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
论著

重型颅脑创伤患者开颅术后远隔部位二次手术的危险因素分析

  • 杜海平 ,
  • 高峰
展开
  • 山东省单县海吉亚医院神经外科,山东 菏泽 274300
杜海平(1977—),男,硕士,副主任医师,从事临床神经外科工作;电子信箱:1072295304@qq.com

收稿日期: 2021-04-13

  网络出版日期: 2022-08-17

Risk factors for secondary surgery at distant sites after craniotomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury

  • DU Haiping ,
  • GAO Feng
Expand
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Haijiya Hospital, Shan County, Heze 274300, Shandong, China

Received date: 2021-04-13

  Online published: 2022-08-17

摘要

目的 分析重型颅脑创伤患者开颅术后远隔部位二次手术的危险因素,为围手术期监测及治疗提供参考。方法 采用回顾性分析,收集2016年1月—2019年3月163例重型颅脑创伤(TBI)患者资料,根据远隔部位是否二次手术分为二次手术组(n=37)和对照组(n=126),比较两组创伤着力部位、血肿位置、术前格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS) 等可能导致远隔部位二次手术的相关因素,对有统计学意义的因素根据权重赋值,采用多因素logistic回归分析。结果 二次手术组良好、中残率为45.94%,低于对照组的65.87%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。二次手术组受伤时枕部着力、血肿位置在对侧或双侧、有合并伤、去骨瓣减压、术前PLT<80×109/L、中线移位、远隔部位骨折患者的构成比例高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,枕部着力+对侧血肿(OR=0.704,95%CI:0.517~1.296)、术前PLT水平<80×109/L(OR=1.573, 95%CI:1.106~4.821)、去骨瓣减压(OR=4.251,95%CI:2.592~6.281)及远隔部位骨折(OR=5.092, 95%CI: 3.702~13.173)是重型TBI患者远隔部位二次手术的危险因素。结论 枕部着力+对侧血肿、术前PLT水平<80×109/L、去骨瓣减压及远隔部位骨折是重型TBI患者远隔部位二次手术的危险因素,对于合并上述危险因素的患者在开颅术后应密切观察病情变化,一旦出现颅内压升高或意识状态变化,及时行头颅CT检查,符合远隔部位二次手术指征及时手术治疗。

本文引用格式

杜海平 , 高峰 . 重型颅脑创伤患者开颅术后远隔部位二次手术的危险因素分析[J]. 外科研究与新技术(中英文), 2022 , 11(1) : 14 -18 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2022.01.003

Abstract

Objective To analyze the risk factors for secondary surgery at distant sites after craniotomy in patients with severe craniocerebral trauma, so as to provide reference for perioperative monitoring and treatment. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted. A total of 163 cases of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) were selected from from January 2016 to March 2019, and according to whether secondary surgery was performed at distant sites, they were divided into a secondary surgery group (n=37) and a control group (n=126). Comparisons were made in trauma site, hematoma site, preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and other factors may cause secondary surgery at distant sites, and significant factors were assigned a value based on weight. A multiple logistic regression analysis was also conducted. Results In the secondary surgery group, the good and moderate disability rate was 45.94%, lower than 65.87% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the secondary surgery group, the proportions of patients with occipital impact, hematoma on the contralateral or bilateral position, associated injury, decompression by bone flap removal, preoperative PLT < 80×109/L, midline displacement, and distal fracture were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis results showed that occipital impact + contralateral hematoma, preoperative PLT < 80×109/L, decompression by bone flap removal, and distal fracture were risk factors for secondary surgery of distal part in patients with severe TBI (OR=0.704, 1.573, 4.251, 5.092; 95%CI: 0.517-1.296, 1.106-4.821, 2.592-6.281, 3.702-13.173). Conclusion Occipital impact + contralateral hematoma, preoperative PLT < 80×109/L, decompression by bone flap removal, and distal fracture are risk factors for secondary surgery at distant sites in patients with severe TBI. Patients with a combinition of these factors should be closely monitored after craniotomy. Once there is an increase in intracranial pressure or change in consciousness, a cranial CT examination should be performed promptly, and an operation should be performed promptly if the indication for secondary surgery in the distal compartment is met.

参考文献

[1] 汪彤彤,钱金明,郑德群.脑室型颅内压监测对重型颅脑损伤患者脱水剂应用及预后的影响[J].医学临床研究,2017,34(11):2252-2254.
[2] 周立田,杨平来,丁俊宏,等.早期应用重组活化凝血因子Ⅶ对重型颅脑外伤的临床疗效[J].临床神经外科杂志,2017,14(5):374-377.
[3] 罗杰,陈谦学.乌司他丁辅助低温控制性减压对重型颅脑损伤手术患者预后的影响[J].中国医药,2018,13(9):1328-1332.
[4] 刘裕浩,李华晓,黄汉文,等.不同方法治疗重型颅脑损伤去骨瓣术后皮瓣下积液临床疗效[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(5):882-883.
[5] 潘晶晶,邵雪非,徐光斌,等.标准外伤大骨瓣减压配合显微手术治疗重型颅脑损伤分析[J].皖南医学院学报,2019,38(1):57-59.
[6] 姜晓辉,陈东.标准大骨瓣开颅减压手术对重型颅脑损伤患者血流动力学及血清炎性因子的影响[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(3):25-27.
[7] 疏龙飞,蔡桑,赵伟,等.重型颅脑创伤患者开颅术后远隔部位再次手术的相关因素分析[J].中华神经外科杂志,2017,33(7):682-686.
[8] 董蕻,刘先觉,蒋建新,等.道路交通事故致行人中、重度颅脑损伤的有限元分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2008,24(10):775-778.
[9] 刘海兵,王守森,洪景芳,等.重型颅脑损伤术中急性脑膨出与损伤部位的相关性分析[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2018,23(12):532-535.
[10] 贾琴. 重型颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后医院感染的影响因素研究[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2018,23(12):539-542.
[11] Talbott JF, Gean A, Yuh EL, et a1. Calvarial fracture pattems on CT imaging predict risk of a delayed epidural hematoma following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain iniury[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2014,35(10):1930-1935.
[12] 赵有发,邢鸣,张远明.重型颅脑损伤术中急性脑膨出64例原因分析[J].苏州大学学报(医学版),2010,30(6):1312-1313.
[13] 赵鹤翔,徐丁,杨朝华.有占位效应的重型颅脑损伤术后再次手术去骨瓣减压41例分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2017,19(5):379-381.
[14] 孟利江,熊福丽,张山,等.每搏输出量变异度指导重型颅脑损伤手术患者容量治疗的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2018,38(9):1119-1123.
文章导航

/