目的 探究三分定位平衡法治疗混合痔疗效。方法 筛选2019年1月—2020年9月60例混合痔患者,根据治疗方式的差别分为观察组(30例,采用三分定位平衡法)和对照组(30例,采用传统的外剥内扎方式手术),比较两组患者的临床疗效、并发症发生率、手术时间和痊愈时间。结果 治疗后,观察组痊愈25例,显效3例,无效2例,总有效率93.33%,显著高于对照组P<0.05。治疗后,观察组患者术后疼痛1例,肛门功能失禁1例,肛门水肿1例,并发症发生率10.00%,显著低于对照组,P<0.05。治疗后,观察组手术时间(15.56±4.51) min和创面痊愈时间(7.50±1.35) d显著短于对照组,P<0.05。结论 在混合痔的临床治疗中,选择三分定位平衡法,可显著提高治疗成功率,缩短手术时间和创口痊愈时间,降低肛门水肿、肛门功能失禁和术后疼痛发生率,值得临床参考。
Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of three-point balanced therapy on mixed hemorrhoids. Methods A total of 60 patients with mixed hemorrhoids from January 2019 to September 2020 were selected and divided into an observation group (30 cases, who received three-point balanced therapy) and a control group (30 cases, who received traditional external stripping and internal ligation) according to treatment methods. The clinical efficacy, incidence of complications, operation time, and recovery time of the two groups of patients were compared. Results After treatment, in the observation group, 25 cases were cured, 3 cases improved, and 2 cases failed. The total effective rate of the observation group was 93.33%, significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, in the observation group, 1 patient had postoperative pain, 1 patient had anal incontinence, and 1 patient had anal edema, and the incidence rate of complications of the observation group was 10.00%, significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the operative time was (15.56±4.51) min and the wound healing time was (7.50±1.35) min of the observation group, significantly shorter than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion In the clinical treatment of mixed hemorrhoids, applying three-point balanced therapy can significantly improve the success rate of treatment, shorten the time of operation and wound healing, reduce the incidence of anal edema, anal incontinence, and postoperative pain, which is worthy of clinical reference.
[1] 陈军,陈波.关于TST联合外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的临床疗效分析[J].智慧健康,2018,4(6):158-159.
[2] 昝朝元,陈富军,李杉,等.直肠黏膜悬吊外剥内扎术与Milligan-Morgan术治疗混合痔的对比研究[J].实用中西医结合临床,2018,18(4):6-8.
[3] 郭朝文. 探究肛瘘切除术联合混合痔外剥内扎术治疗肛瘘伴混合痔的临床疗效和安全性[J].实用医技杂志,2018,25(6):614-615.
[4] 费保刚,常永春,郭建平.外剥内扎联合自动套扎术治疗混合痔预后不良的早期预警[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2018,21(9):729-731.
[5] 宋小平,陈显韬,闫骁春.改良外剥内扎术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效观察[J].中国现代医学杂志,2020,30(8):111-115.
[6] 苏英. 吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术联合外剥内扎术治疗老年环形混合痔患者的疗效分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(22):83-85.
[7] 刘相宇. 外剥内扎术治疗混合痔XX例临床分析[J].,家庭医药,2020,(1):378-379.
[8] 孙孝仁,庄松华.选择性痔上黏膜切除钉合加外痔切除术与外剥内扎术治疗重度混合痔疗效对比[J].国际医药卫生导报,2018,24(24):3817.