目的 探讨超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞+单侧脊椎麻醉在老年股骨颈骨折后路髋关节置换术中的应用效果。方法 选择阳江市中医医院麻醉科2021年1月—7月开展后路髋关节置换术的老年股骨颈骨折患者50例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组25例与观察组25例,对照组采用腰硬联合麻醉,观察组采用超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞+单侧脊椎麻醉,比较两组麻醉效果、血压波动、感觉与运动时间、术后镇痛泵使用情况、术后疼痛情况及不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组麻醉优良率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组血压波动优良率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组感觉阻滞时间、运动阻滞时间、感觉恢复时间、运动恢复时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组首次按压镇痛泵时间晚于对照组,术后48 h内按压镇痛泵次数与补救镇痛次数少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后4 h、8 h、24 h静息视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分与术后12、24 h运动VAS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞复合单侧脊椎麻醉在老年股骨颈骨折后路髋关节置换术中麻醉效果优于腰硬联合麻醉,可使患者血压波动不明显,缩短感觉与运动时间,缓解术后疼痛,且不增加不良反应。
Objective To investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided iliac fascial space block and unilateral spinal anesthesia in posterior hip arthroplasty for elderly femoral neck fractures. Methods Fifty elderly patients with femoral neck fractures undergoing posterior hip arthroplasty in the Department of Anesthesiology, Yangjiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January to July 2021 were selected and divided into a control group and an observation group, with 25 cases in each group. The control group was treated with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, and the observation group was treated with ultrasound-guided iliac fascial space block combined with unilateral spinal anesthesia. Anesthesia effects, blood pressure fluctuations, sensory and motor-related time, and postoperative analgesic pump usage, pain, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The excellent and good rate of anesthesia in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the excellent and good rate of blood pressure fluctuation in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the sensory block time, motor block time, sensory recovery time, and motor recovery time were shorter in the observations group than in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); the observation group first pressed the analgesic pump later than the control group, pressed less times of analgesic pumps within 48 h after operation, and conducted less number of remedial analgesia, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); the observation group showed lower at-rest Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at postoperative 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h, as well as during-movement VAS scores at postoperative 12 h and 24 h than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); the difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided iliac fascial space block plus unilateral spinal anesthesia shows a better anesthesia effect than combined spinal-epidural anesthesia during posterior hip arthroplasty for elderly femoral neck fractures, which can shorten sensory and motor-related time and relieve postoperative pain, with little influence on patients’ blood pressure, and induce few adverse reactions.
[1] 邹康,罗炜.3D打印技术在髋关节置换术中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2021,38(4):436-440.
[2] 林冬阳,周海军,朱明,等. PICCO在老年髋关节手术麻醉及血流动力学优化中的应用[J].现代生物医学进展,2018,18(6):1073-1076.
[3] 刘艳红. 不同比重麻醉药椎管内麻醉用于老年患者髋关节置换手术中的效果比较[J].河北医药,2019,41(6):904-909.
[4] 马远忠,刘莲红.神经阻滞联合全麻在老年髋关节置换术中的麻醉效果及对患者应激反应的影响[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2020,26(5):858-863.
[5] 刘维丽,王威,许钦,等. 围术期不同阶段心理干预对肝胆外科手术患者的应用效果[J]. 河北医药,2021,43(17):2647-2649.
[6] 贺轲渝,杨家福,薛昀,等.可视化超声引导腰椎选择性神经根阻滞的临床应用研究[J].实用医院临床杂志,2017,14(5):141-144.
[7] 胡翠纹,郭轩,张琪,等.美国麻醉医师协会体质分级对老年手术患者心脏自主神经功能的评价意义[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2021,23(5):491-494.
[8] 吴茜,李继,柯希建,等.超声引导下腰骶丛联合T12/L1椎旁神经阻滞在全髋关节置换术中的临床应用[J].临床外科杂志,2017,25(8):634-637.
[9] 聂杰,王飞,唐莉.B超引导下髂筋膜阻滞联合罗哌卡因单侧腰麻对老年髋关节手术快速康复的影响[J].海军医学杂志,2019,40(5):444-448.
[10] 滕立初,陈拓,黄屾,等.平卧位直接前方入路与后外侧入路在全髋关节置换术中的临床疗效及术后VAS评分比较[J].河北医学,2020,26(5):820-825.
[11] 马晶晶,武淑晶,邓立琴,等.老年患者髋部骨折手术麻醉的优化策略:髂筋膜间隙阻滞联合单侧腰麻[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2020,40(9):1109-1112.
[12] 傅小力,杨光,王利利,等.老年髋部骨折手术腰麻复合髂筋膜间隙阻滞镇痛效果的研究[J]. 实用老年医学,2019,33(12):1213-1216.