目的 探讨针对性护理措施在患者留置胃管中的应用及对插管效果的研究。方法 选择2021年1月—2021年7月采取过留置胃管的280例患者作为本次研究的对象;采用随机数表法分为两组,对照组(137例)和试验组(143例);对照组给予常规的护理方法,试验组采取针对性护理;对比两组患者的负面情绪、舒适情况以及插管成功率。结果 试验组同对照组相比,前者在SAS评分方面以及焦虑患者数量方面均明显低于后组(P<0.05);在舒适度方面,试验组极微不适的患者分别占比为54.55%,而对照组极微不适的患者占比仅为9.49%,前组明显高于后组(P<0.05);试验组难以忍受的患者占比低至0.00%,明显低于对照组的占比19.71%(P<0.05);试验组同对照组患者相比,前组患者的一次成功率高达93.01%,明显高于对照组71.53%的一次成功率(P<0.05)。结论 在患者的留置胃管过程中,给予其针对性护理措施能够很大程度上缓解患者的负面情绪,提高舒适度和一次插管的成功率,应广泛应用于临床治疗过程中。
Objective To explore the application of targeted nursing measures in patients with indwelling gastric tube and its effect on intubation. Methods From January 2021 to July 2021, a total of 280 patients who had an indwelling gastric tube were selected as the subjects of this study. The random number table method was used to divide them into two groups, a control group (137 cases) and an experimental group (143 cases). The control group was given conventional nursing methods, and the experimental group was given targeted nursing. The two groups of patients were compared in their negative emotions, comfort, and intubation success rate. Results Compared with the control group, the experimental group was significantly lower in terms of SAS score and the number of anxiety patients (P<0.05). In terms of comfort, the proportion of patients with minimal discomfort in the experimental group was 54.55% and that in the control group was only 9.49%, with a significant difference (P<0.05); the proportion of patients with unbearable discomfort in the experimental group was as low as 0.00%, which was significantly lower than 19.71% in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the one-time success rate of the experimental group was as high as 93.01%, which was significantly higher than 71.53% of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion In the process of indwelling gastric tube in patients, targeted nursing measures can remarkably relieve the negative emotions of patients, improve comfort and the success rate of one-time intubation, and should be widely used in clinical treatment.
[1] 杨丽. 针对性护理干预对留置胃管患者反流性食管炎的影响[J].饮食保健,2019,6(26):176-179.
[2] 杨柳. 针对性护理干预对留置胃管患者反流性食管炎的影响[J].中国医药指南,2019,17(14):270-271.
[3] 庄奕翔,李银林.胃肠手术患者胃管不同处理策略对术后并发症风险及胃肠恢复的影响分析[J].当代医学,2019,517(2):147-149.
[4] 张桂云. 针对性护理对宫颈癌放疗患者急性胃肠道反应发生情况的影响[J].中国医药指南,2020,18(29):190-192.
[5] 张祎炜,陈敏.针对性护理干预对胃癌根治术患者术后胃肠功能及胃乏力发生率影响[J].中国保健营养,2020,30(4):226-227.
[6] 李海燕. 小儿外科留置胃管的护理安全隐患及对策[J].饮食科学,2019,420(4):268.
[7] 冯梅玲. 快速康复护理对结肠癌术后患者住院时间、住院费用、胃肠功能的影响[J].全科护理,2019,17(1):92-94.
[8] 郭斌艳,刘延锦.针对性护理干预在神经重症经鼻胃管早期肠内营养患者中的作用[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版),2019,19(69):272-273.
[9] 白婷,高红梅.针对性护理对肠胃手术患者术后胃肠功能恢复的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2020,5(7):165-166.
[10] Bui NQ, Wang DS, Hiniker SM.Contemporary management of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma[J]. Curr Probl Cancer, 2019, 43(4): 289-299.
[11] 陈阳. 新型胃管固定包在术后留置胃管患者中的应用[J]. 当代临床医刊, 2019, 32(1): 3-5.