目的 分析急诊血管介入栓塞治疗创伤性血流动力学不稳定型骨盆骨折的效果。方法 对124例创伤性骨盆骨折伴血流动力学不稳定的患者进行研究分析,男59例,女65例,平均年龄（33.5±2.8）岁;致伤原因：交通事故76例、高处坠落27例、其他21例,根据患者选择治疗方法的不同分为采用传统保守治疗方法的对照组（n=61）和采用介入性血管栓塞术的观察组（n=63）。比较术前、术后两组患者血流动力学指标情况。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数以及并发症发生情况。术后3个月时,采用Majeed骨盆骨折功能评分和欧洲五维健康量表（EQ-5D）评估患者的手术疗效和生活质量。结果 两组间一般资料无明显差异。观察组术后心率、血乳酸盐较对照组下降更为明显（P<0.001）;观察组术后收缩压、中心静脉压较对照组均显著升高（P<0.001）。术后1年后随访,对照组与观察组Majeed评分和EQ-5D指数均显著优于术前（P<0.05）;观察组Majeed评分和EQ-5D指数显著低于对照组（均P<0.001）。结论 急诊血管介入栓塞治疗对于创伤性血流动力学不稳定型骨盆骨折患者具有较好效果,可为临床抢救、治疗提供良好的条件。
Objective To analyze the effect of emergency interventional vascular embolization in the treatment of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Methods A total of 124 patients with traumatic pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability were enrolled in the study. There were 59 males and 65 females, with an average age of （33.5±2.8） years. Causes of injury： 76 cases of traffic accidents, 27 cases of falling from heights, and 21 other cases. According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into a control group（n=61） using traditional conservative treatment and an observation group （n=63） using interventional vascular embolization. The hemodynamic indicators of the two groups of patients before and after surgery were compared. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization days, and complications were compared between the two groups. The Majeed pelvic fracture function score and the European quality of life-5 dimensions scale （EQ-5D） were used to evaluate the surgical efficacy and quality of life of the patients 3 months after surgery. Results There was no significant difference in general information between the two groups. The postoperative heart rate and blood lactate of the observation group decreased more significantly than those of the control group （P<0.001）; the postoperative systolic blood pressure and central venous pressure of the observation group were significantly increased compared with the control group（P<0.001）. At the follow-up one year after operation, the Majeed score and EQ-5D index of the control group and the observation group were significantly better than those before operation （P<0.05）. The Majeed score and the EQ-5D index of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group （P<0.001）. Conclusion Emergency vascular interventional embolization has a good effect on patients with traumatic hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures, which provides good conditions for clinical rescue and treatment.
[1] Lin SS, Zhou SG, He LS, et al.The effect of preperitoneal pelvic packing for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2021, 24(2): 100-103.
[2] Watkins RJ, Hsu JM.The road to survival for haemodynamically unstable patients with open pelvic fractures[J]. Front Surg, 2020,7(2): 58.
[3] Mi M, Kanakaris NK, Wu X, et al.Management and outcomes of open pelvic fractures: an update[J]. Injury, 2021,52(10): 2738-2745.
[4] Benders KEM, Leenen LPH.Management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic ring fractures[J]. Front Surg, 2020, 7(4): 601321.
[5] Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S, et al.Low-trauma pelvic fractures in elderly finns in 1970-2013[J]. Calcif Tissue Int,2015, 97(6): 577-580.
[6] Montmany S, Rebasa P, Luna A, et al.Source of bleeding in trauma patients with pelvic fracture and haemodynamic instability[J]. Cir Esp, 2015, 93(7): 450-454.
[7] 郭雄飞,王小阵,陈龙. 微创接骨板内固定治疗不稳定型骨盆骨折的临床疗效观察[J].安徽医学,2018,39(11):1328-1329.
[8] Jang JY, Bae KS, Kang BH, et al.Comparison between external fixation and pelvic binder in patients with pelvic fracture and haemodynamic instability who underwent various haemostatic procedures[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 3664.
[9] Djaja YP, Silitonga J, Dilogo IH, et al.The management of pelvic ring fractures in low-resource environments: review[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2023, 33(3): 515-523.
[10] Bonde A, Velmahos A, Kalva SP, et al.Bilateral internal iliac artery embolization for pelvic trauma: effectiveness and safety[J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 220(2): 454-458.
[11] 江红,许城城,陈映淳,等.脉冲式预注射生理盐水在CT增强扫描中预防造影剂外渗的研究[J].实用医学杂志,2022,38(2):239-242.
[12] 吴水平. 腹主动脉阻断联合髂内动脉栓塞治疗创伤性骨盆骨折出血的临床观察[J].浙江创伤外科,2021,26(1):21-22.
[13] 蔡成成,罗海滨,王海峰. 经髂内动脉栓塞术治疗骨盆骨折合并大出血的近期疗效[J].中国实用医药,2018,13(12): 59-60.
[14] Maruhashi T, Kurihara Y, Oi M, et al.Efficacy of median sacral artery embolization for treating severe pelvic fractures: a retrospective study[J]. J Int Med Res, 2021, 49(12): 3306-3315.
[15] Moskowitz EE, Burlew CC, Moore EE, et al.Preperitoneal pelvic packing is effective for hemorrhage control in open pelvic fractures[J]. Am J Surg, 2018, 215(4): 675-677.
[16] Choi D, Cho WT, Song HK, et al.Management strategy for open pelvic fractures: a 11-year single-centre,retrospective observational study[J]. Injury, 2023, 54(4): 1156-1162.
[17] Verma V, Sen RK, Tripathy SK, et al.Factors affecting quality of life after pelvic fracture[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma,2020, 11(6): 1016-1024.
[18] Lai CY, Lai PJ, Tseng IC, et al.Postoperative reduction quality may be the most important factor that causes worse functional outcomes in open and closed pelvic fractures[J]. World J Surg, 2022, 46(3): 568-576.
