目的 探讨经皮脊柱内镜下椎管减压术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症的效果。方法 选择2021年7月—2023年9月收治的腰椎椎管狭窄症患者90例作为研究对象,依据随机数字表法分为2组,每组各45例。对照组采用常规腰椎减压术治疗,观察组采用经皮脊柱内镜下椎管减压术治疗,分析比较两组临床疗效、手术指标、疼痛评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)。结果 两组患者治疗后临床症状明显改善,观察组临床有效率高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组手术指标(包括手术时间、术中出血量)水平低于对照组(P<0.05),住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05),疼痛评分、ODI数值均低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组随访率较对照组高,并发症发生率较对照组低(P<0.05)。结论 经皮脊柱内镜下椎管减压术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄疾病效果显著,患者的疼痛程度明显减轻,其腰椎功能障碍得到改善,利于患者病情恢复,临床上可借鉴及推广。
Objective To investigate the effect of percutaneous endoscopic spinal decompression in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods A total of 90 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis from July 2021 to September 2023 were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups using a random number table method, with 45 patients in each group. The control group received conventional lumbar decompression surgery, while the observation group received percutaneous endoscopic spinal decompression surgery. The clinical efficacy, surgical indicators, pain scores, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were compared between the two groups. Results After symptomatic treatment, the clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients improved significantly, and the observation group showed a higher effective rate than the control group (P<0.05). The levels of surgical indicators (operation time and intraoperative blood loss volume) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), the hospital stay was shorter (P<0.05), and the pain score and ODI values were lower (P<0.05). Conclusion Percutaneous endoscopic spinal decompression has a significant effect on lumbar spinal stenosis, with significantly reduced pain levels and lighter lumbar dysfunction, which is beneficial for patient recovery. It can be used for reference and promotion in clinical practice.
[1] 刘合庆,张娟,李松,等. 经皮全可视脊柱内镜360°椎管减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床对照研究[J].中外医疗,2021,40(16):18-22.
[2] 谷艳超,李莹,谢维,等. 单边双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症临床分析[J].国际骨科学杂志,2021,42(5):323-328.
[3] 钟镕伟, 陈嘉裕, 刘展亮. 经椎板间入路脊柱内镜下腰椎微创手术的临床应用[J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2023, 12(2): 86-88.
[4] 马力,刘艺明,韩国嵩,等. 脊柱内镜下单侧入路双侧椎管减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的早期疗效[J].临床骨科杂志,2023,26(1):19-23.
[5] 王洪根,孙雁宇,林清福,等. 脊柱内镜技术治疗老年性腰椎椎管狭窄症的疗效分析[J].中外医疗,2023,42(14):53-57.
[6] 赖伟强,黄煜智,黎旭,等. 脊柱内镜下减压融合内固定术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效[J].分子影像学杂志,2022,45(6):912-916.
[7] 陈道裕,李进,俞涛,等. 经皮腰椎全内镜下单侧入路双侧减压治疗单节段腰椎椎管狭窄症的临床疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2022,11(9):659-663.
[8] 赖伟强,黄煜智,黎旭,等. 脊柱内镜下减压融合内固定术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效[J].分子影像学杂志,2022,45(6):912-916.
[9] 杨国志,张桂萍,李雷,等. 经皮内窥镜下经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症[J].脊柱外科杂志,2021,19(5):313-317.
[10] 张爱梁,胡勇,刘锦波,等. 脊柱内镜下单侧入路双侧减压术治疗腰椎椎管狭窄症的疗效[J].江苏医药,2020,46(12):1289-1292.
[11] 胡前芹,谢水华,孙雷,等. 单侧双通道内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄的临床疗效分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2022,28(6):533-536.
[12] 乔梁,刘猛,刘加元,等. 单边双通道内镜技术治疗老年腰椎压缩性骨折继发椎管狭窄2例报告[J].实用骨科杂志,2021,27(11):1048-1051.