目的 探讨不同补片固定方式在腹股沟疝腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术中的应用价值。方法 选取2020年3月—2023年3月北京市平谷区中医医院收治的100例腹股沟疝患者,按照治疗方式的不同分为免固定组(67例,采用自固定补片进行腹腔镜TEP疝修补术)和医用胶组(33例,采用传统补片进行腹腔镜TEP疝修补术);对两组患者临床资料进行比较分析。结果 两组手术时间及术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),免固定组肛门首次排气时间、术后进食时间、自主活动时间及住院时间均显著短于医用胶组(P<0.05);经治疗,两组患者视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、健康调查量表36(SF-36)评分均得到显著改善(P<0.05),且免固定组治疗后各时间点VAS评分及术后6个月SF-36评分均显著优于医用胶组(P<0.05);免固定组术后并发症发生率显著低于医用胶组(P<0.05)。结论 采用自固定补片腹腔镜TEP疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝可促进患者术后康复,同时显著降低术后并发症,值得临床借鉴推广。
Objective To evaluate the value of different mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy for inguinal hernia. Methods A total of 100 patients with inguinal hernia treated in Beijing Pinggu District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2020 to March 2023 were selected and divided into two groups according to different treatment methods: non-fixation group (67 cases, laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy with self-fixation mesh) and medical adhesive group (33 cases, laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy with traditional mesh). The clinical data of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in operative time and amount of bleeding (P>0.05). The time of first anal exsufflation, eating after operation, free movement and hospitalization in the non-fixed group were significantly shorter than those in the medical adhesive group (P<0.05). After treatment, the visual analogue scale (VAS) and short form 36-item health survey (SF-36) scores of both groups were significantly improved (P<0.05), and the VAS and SF-36 scores at 6 months after operation in the non-fixed group were significantly better than those in the medical adhesive group (P<0.05). The incidence rate of postoperative complications in the non-fixation group was significantly lower than that in the medical adhesive group (P<0.05). Conclusion The laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy for inguinal hernia with self-fixed mesh can promote the postoperative rehabilitation of patients, and can significantly reduce the postoperative complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
[1] 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志,2018,56(7):495-498.
[2] 崗崎寿美子,菊一好子,林琳.疼痛护理的评价[J]. 中华护理杂志,1992,27(7):291.
[3] Michelle KW, Stephen MM, Avery AR, et al.A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(7): 1757-1767.
[4] 何万鹏,彭超.腹腔镜下经腹腔腹股沟疝补片修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的临床效果观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2023,20(1):150-152.
[5] 李伟,周保军,焦喜林,等.基于膜解剖的精细开放腹股沟疝修补术对男性Ⅲ、Ⅳ型腹股沟斜疝患者的治疗效果观察[J]. 临床误诊误治,2022,35(3):89-92.
[6] Tseng SI, Li CC, Lee HY, et al.Previous unilateral inguinal hernia repair increase risk of new developed inguinal hernia: a nationwide Longitudinal Cohort Study in Asian male adult patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(1): 346-351.
[7] 高金海,郭邦振.TAPP术对腹股沟疝患者术后疼痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 贵州医药,2022,46(12):1875-1877.
[8] 桑鸿雁,张敏.腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果分析[J]. 外科研究与新技术,2019,8(4):234-236.
[9] 周洋,穆蕊,吴彤,等.腹膜前与腹膜外入路腹腔镜修补术治疗腹股沟疝术后并发症的比较[J]. 宁夏医学杂志,2023,45(2):170-171.
[10] 赵志军,尹清力,张康鑫.不同补片固定方式对Ⅰ和Ⅱ型腹股沟疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术疗效对比分析[J]. 社区医学杂志,2021,19(6):365-368.
[11] 刘贵远,周海华.以膜为解剖标志在腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用及临床意义[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022,26(21):123-126.
[12] 刘志宁,程晓虎,余富龙,等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中应用反穿刺侧位布孔法的临床效果[J]. 安徽医学,2022,43(10):1176-1180.
[13] 马锐,张成,郭一君,等.自固定补片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中应用临床疗效研究[J]. 创伤与急危重病医学, 2023,11(1):46-49.
[14] 韩凤梅,王颖.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中应用自固定补片的临床效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2021, 15(6):575-578.