《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊

外科研究与新技术 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4): 287-290.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2021.04.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

围手术期输注利多卡因对妇科腹腔镜手术苏醒期躁动和全麻苏醒质量的影响

李言民, 焦妮妮, 胡蕊   

  1. 徐州市中医院麻醉科,江苏 徐州 221000
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-27 出版日期:2021-12-28 发布日期:2022-08-22
  • 通讯作者: 焦妮妮,电子信箱:504303793@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李言民(1980—),男,硕士研究生,副主任医师,从事临床麻醉科工作

Effect of perioperative lidocaine infusion on restlessness and general anesthesia recovery quality after gynecological laparoscopic surgery

LI Yanmin, JIAO Nini, HU Rui   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2021-08-27 Online:2021-12-28 Published:2022-08-22

摘要: 目的 观察静脉输注利多卡因用于妇科腹腔镜手术对患者麻醉苏醒效果的影响。方法 选择2019年6月—2021年6月接受妇科腹腔镜全麻手术的患者90例作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法将患者分成利多卡因组(L组)和对照组(C组),每组45例。L组于麻醉诱导前10 min静脉注射利多卡因1 mg/kg,后持续静脉泵注利多卡因1 mg/(kg·h)至手术结束;C组静脉输注等体积的生理盐水。记录丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼使用量,患者拔管后到能语言的恢复时间,停丙泊酚到患者拔管的时间以及拔管后的咳嗽评分,拔管时的镇静评分。在麻醉后监护病房(PACU)的镇静评分、疼痛的评分量表(NRS)评分、恶心呕吐的程度和发生率。结果 拔管后L组咳嗽发生率低于C组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。L组的中度和重度咳嗽发生率显著低于C组(P<0.05)。镇静评分在2组中相似,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。到达PACU时的镇静评分,疼痛的评分量表(NRS)评分以及记录的最高疼痛评分在L组和C组相比没有明显差异(P>0.05)。关于PONV发生率和最高PONV分数,所有组之间没有统计学差异。L组丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的使用量低于C组。此外,所有组之间关于PACU停留时间没有统计学差异。结论 静脉输注利多卡因可改善妇科腹腔镜手术患者麻醉苏醒期拔管的效果,减少丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的使用量。

关键词: 利多卡因, 苏醒质量, 加速康复外科

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of perioperative infusion of lidocaine on restlessness and recovery quality from general anesthesia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods Ninety patients (20-58 years old) who underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into a control group and a lidocaine group, with 45 cases in each group. The lidocaine group were injected intravenously with 1 mg/kg lidocaine 10 min before anesthesia, followed by continuous intravenous pumping of lidocaine at a rate of 1 mg/(kg·h) until the end of the surgery. The control group received intravenous injection of normal saline at the same volume. After operation, propofol and remifentanil usages, language recovery time after extubation, extubation time after propofol stopped, cough score, and sedation score during extubation were recorded. Sedation score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score of pain, vomiting severity and incidence were recorded at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Results Compared with the control group, the lidocaine group showed lower incidence rates of cough, moderate cough, and severe cough (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the sedation score between the two groups (P>0.05). At the PACU, there were no significant differences in the NRS score and the highest pain score between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no differences in the incidence rate of PONV and the highest PONV score between the two groups. Less propofol and remifentanil were used in the lidocaine group than in the control group. In addition, there was no statistical difference in the length of stay in PACU between the two groups. Conclusion Perioperative use of lidocaine could improve the quality of recovery from general anesthesia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery, and reduce the usage of propofol and remifentanil.

Key words: Lidocaine, Quality of recovery, Accelerated rehabilitation surgery

中图分类号: