LVIS支架辅助治疗颈内动脉-后交通动脉（ICA-PcoA）动脉瘤的回顾性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2022.02.002

外科研究与新技术 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 82-86.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2022.02.002

LVIS支架辅助治疗颈内动脉-后交通动脉（ICA-PcoA）动脉瘤的回顾性分析

高峰¹, 杜海平²

1.山东省单县东大医院神经外科,山东菏泽 274300;
2.山东省单县海吉亚医院神经外科,山东菏泽 274300

收稿日期:2021-06-03 出版日期:2022-06-28 发布日期:2022-12-30
作者简介:高峰（1987—）,男,大学本科,主治医师,从事临床神经外科工作;电子信箱：banahh@126.com

Retrospective analysis of LVIS stent-assisted treatment of internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery （ICA-PcoA） aneurysms

GAO Feng¹, DU Haiping²

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Dongda Hospital of Shanxian County, Heze 274300, Shandong, China;
2. Department of Neurosurgery, Haijiya Hospital of Shanxian County, Heze 274300, Shandong, China

Received:2021-06-03 Online:2022-06-28 Published:2022-12-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探究LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗颈内动脉-后交通动脉（ICA-PcoA）动脉瘤的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2016年3月—2020年3月收治的ICA-PcoA动脉瘤患者210例,均行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术,根据支架不同分为3组：70例采用LVIS支架（LVIS组）,70例采用Solitare支架（Solitare组）,70例采用Enterprise支架（Enterprise组）。根据数字减影血管造影（DSA）结果和Raymond标准评估支架的辅助栓塞效果,采用改良Rankin量表（mRS）、日常生活活动能力量表（BI指数）评价预后,并观察手术并发症发生率及动脉瘤复发率。结果 LVIS组、Solitare组和Enterprise组支架置入成功率差异无统计学意义（χ²=1.032,P=0.479）,Raymond分级显示,LVIS组术后即刻及术后6个月动脉瘤栓塞效果优于Solitare组和Enterprise组（均P<0.05）;LVIS组术后6个月,mRS 0~2分患者所占比例、BI指数评分均高于Solitare组和Enterprise组（均P<0.05）;LVIS组手术并发症发生率及动脉瘤复发率均低于Solitare组和Enterprise组,无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。结论 LVIS支架辅助栓塞治疗对ICA-PcoA动脉瘤的栓塞效果好,安全性高,复发率低,但要注意术中血栓形成和术后载瘤动脉狭窄。

关键词: LVIS支架, 颅内动脉瘤, 弹簧圈, 血管内介入治疗

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical effect of LVIS stent-assisted coil embolization on internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery （ICA-PcoA） aneurysms. Methods A total of 210 patients with ICA-PcoA aneurysms admitted to our hospital and receiving stent-assisted coil embolization from March 2016 to March 2020 were divided into three groups according to different stents. Patients in the LVIS group （70 cases） were given LVIS stents, patients in the Solitare group （70 cases） were given Solitare stents, and patients in the Enterprise group （70 cases） were given Enterprise stents. The effect of stent-assisted embolization was assessed by digital subtraction angiography （DSA） and Raymond criteria. Prognostic effect was assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale （mRS） and the Activity of Daily Living Scale （BI index）. The incidence rate of surgical complications and the rate of recurrence of aneurysms were recorded. Results There was no significant difference in the success rate of stent placement among the three groups （χ²=1.032, P=0.479）. The Raymond grading showed that the embolization effect of aneurysms in the LVIS group was better than those in the Solidare group and the Enterprise group immediately after surgery and 6 months after surgery （all P<0.05）. The percentage of patients with 0-2 points of mRS score and BI index in the LVIS group were higher than those in the Solitare group and the Enterprise group after 6 months of surgery （all P<0.05）. The incidence rate of surgical complications and recurrence rate of aneurysms in the LVIS group were lower than those in the Solitare group and the Enterprise group, but there was no significant difference （all P>0.05）. Conclusion LVIS stent-assisted embolization has a good embolization effect on ICA-PcoA aneurysms, with high safety and low recurrence rate, but attention should be paid to intraoperative thrombosis and postoperative parent artery stenosis.

Key words: LVIS stent, Intracranial aneurysm, Coil, Intravascular interventional therapy

中图分类号:

R651.1

高峰, 杜海平. LVIS支架辅助治疗颈内动脉-后交通动脉（ICA-PcoA）动脉瘤的回顾性分析[J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2022, 11(2): 82-86.

GAO Feng, DU Haiping. Retrospective analysis of LVIS stent-assisted treatment of internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery （ICA-PcoA） aneurysms[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2022, 11(2): 82-86.

参考文献

[1] 张荣举,王君,邸海,等.LVIS支架在颅内动脉瘤治疗中的安全性及有效性的单中心观察性研究[J].中国卒中杂志,2018,13(8):785-788.
[2] 冯明陶,冯政哲,方亦斌,等.支架与非支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤的Meta分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2016,13(1):17-24.
[3] 朱雷,冯大勤,周志宇.不同类型支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞宽颈动脉瘤的效果分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2017,20(5):64-65.
[4] 孙异春,刘远来,彭国俊,等.LVIS密网支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞对颅内宽颈小动脉瘤治疗的效果观察[J].吉林医学,2019,40(4):870-871.
[5] 陈振,刘朝,李冬冬,等.LVIS 支架辅助栓塞颅内动脉瘤安全性及有效性分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2017,26(9):775-779.
[6] 朱辰路,明智绪,冯进,等.LVIS 支架在颈内动脉-后交通段动脉瘤中的应用[J].临床神经外科杂志,2019,16(1):45-48.
[7] 张洪剑,杨鹏飞,方亦斌,等.LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈治疗颅内未破裂宽颈动脉瘤中国多中心前瞻性登记(Cranial-1)研究设计方案[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2017,14(10):557-560.
[8] 杨承佑,关敏,徐伟伟,等.3D- DSA 评估颈内动脉-后交通动脉动脉瘤形成的形态学特征[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2016,21(3):53-56.
[9] 李鹏强,岳双柱,周艳宏,等.Solitaire AB支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞13例颅内宽颈动脉瘤的临床分析[J].中国医学创新,2014,11(14):140-142.
[10] 李明华. 一种新型的脑动脉瘤血管内治疗技术——脑血管覆膜支架术的问世[J].介入放射学杂志,2010,19(4):253-256.
[11] Fiorella D, Boulos A, Turk AS, et al.The safety and effectiveness of the LVIS stent system for the treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms: final results of the pivotal US LVIS trial[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2018, 128(11): 223-228.
[12] 冯文献,李力,徐绪昌,等.不同颅内支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞颅内动脉瘤的效果及作用分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2017,20(5):95-96.
[13] 路华,王向鹏,宋海,等.血管内介入栓塞治疗破裂前交通动脉瘤47例临床分析[J].昆明医学院学报,2012,33(1):98-100.
[14] Li WQ, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al.Efficacy of LVIS vs. Enterprise stent for endovascular treatment of medium-sized intracranial aneurysms: A hemodynamic comparison study[J]. Front Neurol, 2019, 10(22): 428-431.
[15] David D, Umang K, Patrick P.T-configuration horizontal low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS Jr) device-assisted coiling for treatment of basilar tip aneurysms: A technical note[J]. World Neuro Surg, 2019, 129(35):522-523.
[16] 李立,李天晓,王子亮,等.LVIS支架辅助栓塞小型颅内动脉瘤的初步经验[J].中华神经外科杂志,2016,32(5):373-374.

LVIS支架辅助治疗颈内动脉-后交通动脉（ICA-PcoA）动脉瘤的回顾性分析

Retrospective analysis of LVIS stent-assisted treatment of internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery （ICA-PcoA） aneurysms

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘博, 张宗强, 何博, 侯文蛟. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈内动脉重度狭窄60例临床分析[J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2022, 11(2): 87-89.
[2]	肖连福, 周希汉, 黄陈铭, 刘琼. 定向钻孔穿刺血肿清除术治疗高血压脑干出血的疗效观察[J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2021, 10(4): 284-286.
[3]	周文博，王炯，陈凌杰. 肺原发性脑膜瘤1例[J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2013, 2(2): 133-126.
[4]	王飞, 朱有厚, 吴一芳, 余飞, 刘宁涛, 海舰. 双侧额叶脑挫裂伤手术时机及颅内压监测的应用价值[J]. 外科研究与新技术, 2013, 2(1): 21-26.