《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊

外科研究与新技术(中英文) ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (2): 142-145.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2024.02.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

选择性颈神经阻滞联合激痛点灭活治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究

王亚峰   

  1. 上海市松江区泗泾医院麻醉科, 上海 201601
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-20 出版日期:2024-06-28 发布日期:2024-07-04
  • 作者简介:王亚峰(1971—),男,硕士研究生,副主任医师,从事临床麻醉科工作;

Clinical efficacy of selective cervical nerve block combined with myofascial trigger point inactivation in treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

WANG Yafeng   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Songjiang District Sijing Hospital, Shanghai 201601, China
  • Received:2024-02-20 Online:2024-06-28 Published:2024-07-04

摘要: 目的 观察选择性颈神经阻滞联合激痛点灭活治疗神经根型颈椎病(CSR)的临床疗效。方法 选取2023年3月—9月于上海松江区泗泾医院疼痛门诊就诊的CSR患者60例,按随机数字表法分为三组,每组20例。治疗组(A组)行选择性颈神经根+脊神经后内侧支阻滞治疗联合激痛点灭活,对照1组(B组)仅行选择性颈神经根+脊神经后内侧支阻滞治疗,对照2组(C组)采用颈部牵引+药物治疗。治疗后第1、4、12周随访患者,进行疗效评价。比较三组患者随访时颈部、上肢疼痛或不适感的疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分及颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)评分。结果 (1) 治疗前后组内比较:治疗后1、4、12周,各组VAS评分和NDI评分均较治疗前明显降低(P<0.01)。(2) 治疗后组间比较:与C组比较,A组和B组各时间点的VAS评分、NDI评分均明显降低(P<0.05);与治疗后12周,A组VAS评分、NDI评分均明显低于B组(P<0.05)。提示A组远期疗效显著优于B组和C组。结论 采用选择性颈神经阻滞联合激痛点灭活治疗CSR,两种疗法相辅相成,可起到优势互补的作用,且具有起效快、疗效持久的特点。

关键词: 神经根型颈椎病, 激痛点, 超声引导, 选择性颈神经阻滞

Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of selective cervical nerve block combined with myofascial trigger point inactivation in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods Sixty CRS patients visiting the pain clinic at Songjiang District Sijing Hospital between March and September 2023 were randomly divided into three groups by random number table method, with 20 cases in each group. The treatment group (group A) received selective cervical nerve root and posteromedial branch block combined with myofascial trigger point inactivation treatment, the control group 1 (group B) received selective cervical nerve root and posteromedial branch block alone, and the control group 2 (group C) was treated with cervical traction and drugs. The patients were followed up at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after treatment for efficacy evaluation. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of neck and upper limb and the neck disability index (NDI) were compared across three groups. Results (1)Intra-group comparison revealed significant decreases in the VAS and NDI scores 1, 4, and 12 weeks after treatment in all groups (P<0.01). (2) Pairwise comparison revealed that group A and group B consistently showed significantly lower VAS and NDI scores than group C at selected post-treatment time points (P<0.05). Notably, group A exhibited significantly lower VAS and NDI scores than group B at the 12th week (P<0.05), indicating a superior long-term effect. Conclusion The combined approach of myofascial trigger point inactivation and selective cervical nerve block for treating CRS demonstrates a synergistic effect, characterized by both rapid and sustained efficacy.

Key words: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, Myofascial trigger point, Ultrasound-guided, Selective cervical nerve block

中图分类号: