改良微创拔牙技术在阻生智齿拔除术中的临床应用及术后肿胀控制分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2026.02.009

外科研究与新技术（中英文） ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2): 137-140.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2026.02.009

改良微创拔牙技术在阻生智齿拔除术中的临床应用及术后肿胀控制分析

高颖, 周允芝

安徽医科大学口腔医学院（安徽医科大学附属口腔医院,安徽省口腔疾病研究重点实验室）望湖城门诊部, 安徽合肥 230032

收稿日期:2026-02-06 出版日期:2026-06-28 发布日期:2026-07-08
作者简介:高颖（1996—）,女,硕士,医师,从事临床口腔外科工作;电子信箱：gaoyy996@163.com

Clinical application of modified minimally invasive tooth extraction technique in impacted wisdom tooth extraction and analysis of postoperative swelling control

GAO Ying, ZHOU Yunzhi

Wanghucheng Outpatient Department, School of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University （Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases in Anhui Province）, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China

Received:2026-02-06 Online:2026-06-28 Published:2026-07-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨改良微创拔牙技术在阻生智齿拔除术中的临床应用及术后肿胀控制效果。方法选择2024年4月—2026年1月收治的100例阻生智齿患者进行前瞻性研究,按随机数字表法分为两组,每组50例。对照组实施常规微创拔牙术,观察组实施改良微创拔牙术,比较两组术后并发症发生率、术后肿胀程度与术后疼痛程度。结果观察组术后并发症发生率为2％,低于对照组的14％（P<0.05）。术后2、72 h,观察组肿胀程度、疼痛程度均低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论改良微创拔牙术可有效治疗阻生智齿,可减少术后并发症,减轻术后肿胀及疼痛症状,值得临床推广。

关键词: 阻生智齿, 常规微创拔牙术, 改良微创拔牙术, 术后肿胀控制

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical application value of modified minimally invasive tooth extraction technique in impacted wisdom tooth extraction and the effect on postoperative swelling control. Methods A prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with impacted wisdom teeth admitted from April 2024 to January 2026. The patients were divided into two groups using the random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. The control group underwent conventional minimally invasive tooth extraction, while the observation group underwent modified minimally invasive tooth extraction. The postoperative complications, degree of postoperative swelling, and degree of postoperative pain were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 2.00%, which was lower than that in the control group （14.00%）（P<0.05）. At 2 h and 72 h after surgery, the degrees of swelling and pain in the observation group were lower than those in the control group （P<0.05）. Conclusion Modified minimally invasive tooth extraction can effectively treat impacted wisdom teeth, reduce postoperative complications, alleviate postoperative swelling and pain symptoms, and is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Impacted wisdom tooth, Conventional minimally invasive extraction, Modified minimally invasive extraction, Postoperative swelling control

中图分类号:

R782.1

高颖, 周允芝. 改良微创拔牙技术在阻生智齿拔除术中的临床应用及术后肿胀控制分析[J]. 外科研究与新技术（中英文）, 2026, 15(2): 137-140.

参考文献

[1] 汤玉龙,段闪闪,陶翠竹. 微创拔牙术在下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿拔除中的应用[J]. 中国美容医学,2025,34(7):150-154.
[2] 王慧,郭婧芳,王彦帝,等. CBCT辅助超声骨刀用于下颌水平位阻生牙微创拔牙对手术时间、术后恢复及并发症的影响[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志,2025,23(8):28-31.
[3] 王慧,郭婧芳,王彦帝,等. CBCT辅助超声骨刀用于下颌水平位阻生牙微创拔牙手术效果及对疼痛程度、术后恢复的影响[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志,2025,23(5):43-45.
[4] 曹冬,鲍士金,姜吉铨. CBCT引导下超声骨刀微创拔牙术对埋伏阻生牙患者龈沟液MMPs、并发症及满意度的影响[J]. 临床误诊误治,2025,38(20):99-105.
[5] 羊小娟,李灵芝,方略. 微创拔牙术在下颌埋伏阻生智齿拔除中的应用及对患者术后疼痛和美观满意度的影响[J]. 中国美容医学,2024,33(5):140-143.
[6] 刘丽芳,陈平,何小斌. 微创拔牙术联合Er:YAG激光对埋伏阻生齿患者炎性反应、疼痛及预后的影响[J]. 四川医学,2024,45(1):54-58.
[7] 杜文斌,曹玮奇,姚国华,等. 十字形分牙法对复杂下颌水平低位阻生齿拔除患者预后的影响[J]. 中国美容医学,2023,32(3):128-131.
[8] 夏涵,王峰,吴妍慧,等. 口腔锥形束CT联合微创拔牙技术对埋伏阻生牙患者牙槽完整度及张口受限度的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2023,23(20):3903-3907.
[9] 黄超,程茜. 无回吸牙科手机在下颌阻生第三磨牙治疗中的应用效果分析[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2025,17(6):47-50.
[10] 芈大卫,周碧,彭勃,等. 高速涡轮手机联合气动拔牙挺在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的应用[J]. 口腔颌面外科杂志,2023,33(5):326-329.
[11] 王悦,陈克难,姜俊岐,等. 数字化设计结合内镜微创拔除牙根与下颌管接触的下颌阻生第三磨牙[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志,2024,59(12):1221-1227.
[12] 马勇全,陆子杰,彭伟槟,等. 超声骨刀拔除下颌水平低位阻生智齿的疗效及对血清炎性介质的影响[J]. 中国美容医学,2025,34(6):152-155.

改良微创拔牙技术在阻生智齿拔除术中的临床应用及术后肿胀控制分析

Clinical application of modified minimally invasive tooth extraction technique in impacted wisdom tooth extraction and analysis of postoperative swelling control

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价