《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊

外科研究与新技术 ›› 2016, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1): 28-31.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

T1b食管癌淋巴结转移风险的相关因素分析

赵晨1,周悦2,张杨杨3,张辉1,刘锦源4   

  1. 1. 徐州市中心医院
    2. 南京医科大学第一附属医院胸外科
    3. 南京医科大学第一附属医院,心胸外科
    4. 南京医科大学第一附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-01 修回日期:2015-12-15 出版日期:2016-03-28 发布日期:2016-03-08
  • 通讯作者: 周悦 E-mail:chirurgeonzhouyue@163.com

Relative factors analysis of T1 esophageal carcinoma risk of lymph node metastasis

  • Received:2015-12-01 Revised:2015-12-15 Online:2016-03-28 Published:2016-03-08

摘要: [摘 要] 背景 外科手术是治疗食管癌的标准治疗方法,但对于早期食管癌的治疗,创伤较小的内窥镜技术发展迅速,其对传统手术已构成强大挑战。因而筛选病人进行外科手术或内窥镜治疗前评估淋巴结转移风险是必要的。目的 本研究旨在分析T1b食管鳞癌的淋巴结转移危险因素及评估其风险。方法 回顾性分析112例T1b食管鳞癌患者的病例资料及病理检查报告,其中80例无淋巴结转移的病例作为对照组(N0组),32例有淋巴结转移的作为实验组(N1组)。重新进行肿瘤标本的镜下检查,包括肿瘤的长度、浸润深度及淋巴管和血管的浸润,将粘膜下层肿瘤(T1b)浸润深度分为三层(SM1、SM2、SM3)并对淋巴结转移因素进行分析。结果 单因素LOG回归分析显示肿瘤浸润深度、长度、分化程度是影响淋巴结转移的危险因素,多因素LOG回归分析显示肿瘤分化程度是影响淋巴结转移的独立危险因素(p<0.001),去除肿瘤分化程度的多因素LOG回归分析提示肿瘤浸润深度是淋巴结转移的第二独立影响因素(p=0.023)。 结论 T1b食管鳞癌患者的淋巴结转移风险较高,影响因素较多,对于易发生淋巴结转移的患者,外科手术应继续作为标准治疗方法。

关键词: 食管癌, T1b, 淋巴结, 转移

Abstract: [Abstracts] Background Esophagectomy is the standard procedure for esophageal carcinoma, but surgery for early esophageal carcinoma has been challenged by less invasive endoscopic approaches developing quickly. So it is definitely necessary to assess risk of lymph node metastasis before screening patients to have an operation or endoscopic therapy. Objective The aim of this study was to analysis risk factors for lymphatic metastasis in T1b esophageal squamous carcinoma and evaluate its risk. Methods Cases and pathological reports of 112 T1b esophageal squamous carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed, 80 patients(group N0) had no lymph node metastasis seen as control group and 32 patients(group N1) had lymph node metastasis seen as experimental group. Tumor specimens were reevaluated for overall submucosal layer thickness, tumor length, depth of tumor infiltration as well as lymphatic and vascular infiltration. Depth of submucosal tumor infiltration was divided in thirds (SM1, SM2, SM3) and factors influencing lymphatic metastasis were assessed. Results Univariate logistic regression analysis showed depth of tumor infiltration, tumor length and tumor differentiation were risk factors influencing lymphatic metastasis formation. Variate logistic regression analysis showed tumor differentiation was independent risk factor influencing lymphatic metastasis formation(p<0.001), and removed influence of tumor differentiation, there remaining second independent factor that remained significant was tumor infiltration(p=0.023). Conclusion Lymphatic metastasis risk of T1b esophageal squamous carcinoma is high and influencing factors is more, so esophagectomy should sequentially be the standard treatment for T1b patients prone to lymphatic metastasis.

Key words: esophageal carcinoma, T1b, lymph node, metastasis