《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊

外科研究与新技术 ›› 2018, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2): 105-107.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2018.02.007

• 论 著 • 上一篇    下一篇

塞来昔布超前镇痛用于无痛人工流产的临床观察

马燕凤, 徐基良, 彭生   

  1. 上海中医药大学附属第七人民医院,麻醉科200137
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-30 出版日期:2018-06-28 发布日期:2019-12-10
  • 通讯作者: 彭生,电子信箱:ps7707@163.com
  • 作者简介:马燕凤(1973—),女,主治医师,从事疼痛治疗工作
  • 基金资助:
    上海市浦东新区重要薄弱学科(PWZbr2017-19);上海市浦东新区卫生系统学科带头人培养计划(PWRd2016-19);上海市浦东新区卫生系统学科带头人培养计划(PWRd2016-17);上海市卫计委中医药科研基金项目(2014LP029B)

Clinical observation of celecoxib preemptive analgesia for painless abortion

MA Yanfeng, XU Jiliang, PENG Sheng   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai 200137, China
  • Received:2017-10-30 Online:2018-06-28 Published:2019-12-10

摘要: 目的 观察塞来昔布超前镇痛用于无痛人工流产的临床效应。方法 早孕妇女80例,随机均分为塞来昔布组(处理组)和对照组,每组40例。处理组在术前2 h口服塞来昔布400 mg,超前镇痛。两组患者均采用芬太尼0.05 mg+丙泊酚2.0 mg/kg静脉麻醉,之后根据需要追加丙泊酚。记录麻醉开始前(T0)、意识消失时(T1)、扩宫颈时(T2)、呼之睁眼时(T3)和术后1h(T4)的BP、 HR、SPO2、和RR;记录麻醉诱导时间、苏醒时间、术中丙泊酚用药总量、术中肢体活动、舌后坠、呼吸抑制、术中出血量和术后患者疼痛发生情况及不良反应;记录手术结束,患者清醒后5、15、30和60 min的VRS口述痛觉评分。结果 5个时间点的BP、HR、SPO2和RR差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。处理组患者麻醉苏醒时间较对照组显著缩短,丙泊酚总量小于对照组(P<0.05)。术中出血量组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。处理组患者舌后坠、呼吸抑制发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05);处理组患者清醒后不同时点疼痛口述分级评分(VRS)口述痛觉评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 塞来昔布超前镇痛,可减少无痛人工流产手术患者术中丙泊酚用量,减轻术后疼痛,且不增加出血和呼吸抑制等不良反应的发生率。

关键词: 塞来昔布, 超前镇痛, 人工流产

Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical effect of celecoxib preemptive analgesia for painless abortion.Methods Eighty pregnant women in early pregnancy were randomly divided into celecoxib group (treatment group) and control group, 40 cases in each group.Treatment Group received oral celecoxib 400 mg at 2 h before operation for preemptive analgesia, while control group did not.Both groups were given intravenous fentanyl 0.05 mg + propofol 2.0 mg/kg, followed by propofol as needed.BP, HR, SPO2, and RR were recorded before anesthesia (T0), at disappearance of consciousness (T1), at cervix expansion (T2), at opening eyes by prompting (T3), and at 1h after operation (T4); induction time, recovery time, intraoperative total propofol dosage, intraoperative limb movement, glossoptosis, respiratory depression, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative pain and other adverse reactions were recorded; VRS pain scores at 15, 30, and 60 min after surgery were recorded.Results There were no significant differences in BP, HR, SPO2, and RR at the 5 time points (P>0.05).Treatment Group patients’ anesthesia recovery time was significantly shorter than that of control group patients’, and the total propofol dosage was less (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05).In treatment group, the incidence rates of glossoptosis and respiratory depression were significantly lower than those in control group (P<0.05).The pain scores of VRS in treatment group were significantly lower than those in control group at different time points after waking up (P<0.05).Conclusion Celecoxib preemptive analgesia for painless abortion can reduce intraoperative propofol dosage and postoperative pain, while not increase blood loss and the incidence of respiratory depression or other adverse reactions.

Key words: Celecoxib, Preemptive analgesia, Abortion

中图分类号: