《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊

外科研究与新技术 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1): 9-13.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2021.01.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

FRAX模型评估中国老年2型糖尿病患者骨折风险的价值

谢壮丽, 杨军, 宣淼, 计佩芳, 李颖   

  1. 同济大学附属同济医院内分泌代谢科,上海 200065
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2021-05-18
  • 通讯作者: 李 颖,电子信箱:shanxingbo@163.com
  • 作者简介:谢壮丽(1978—),男,硕士研究生,副主任医师,从事临床内分泌代谢科工作

Value of FRAX model in assessing fracture risk of Chinese elderly adults with type 2 diabetes

XIE Zhuangli, YANG Jun, XUAN Miao, JI Peifang, LI Ying   

  1. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China
  • Received:2020-09-11 Published:2021-05-18

摘要: 目的 应用FRAX模型评估老年2型糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的骨折风险,明确FRAX模型评估中国大陆老年2型糖尿病亚群的骨折风险的有效性。方法 随机选取2型糖尿病老年患者267例,对照组(非糖尿病患者)359例,进行调查问卷、骨密度测量、FRAX 分值计算。应用二分类变量回归方法分析FRAX高骨折风险的相关因素。结果 2型糖尿病组体质指数、腰臀比、吸烟比例、饮酒比例均高于对照组(P<0.001)。2型糖尿病组股骨颈和腰椎骨矿含量、骨密度T值、Z值均高于对照组。2型糖尿病组应用FRAX–BMI模型预估10年主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)和髋部骨折(HF)风险均低于对照组[(4.27±2.84)% 对 (5.14±2.92)%, P<0.001; (1.42±1.54)% 对 (1.83±2.23)%, P <0.001)]。应用FRAX-BMD模型评估2型糖尿病组MOF风险低于对照组[(5.28±4.41)% 对 (6.30±5.10)%, P <0.001)]。回归分析显示股骨颈骨密度T值,吸烟,髋部骨折家族史和糖皮质激素应用与髋部骨折高风险有关。股骨颈骨密度T值,吸烟,髋部骨折家族史和既往脆性骨折史与MOF高风险有关。是否罹患2型糖尿病不是FRAX模型预估高骨折风险的相关因素。结论 中国2型糖尿病老年患者应用FRAX模型预估10年骨折风险低于非糖尿病人群预估结果,提示FRAX模型并不完全适合中国人群。

关键词: 2型糖尿病, 骨折风险, 骨密度, FRAX

Abstract: Objective To assess the fracture risk of elderly patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by FRAX model, and to ascertain the validity of this model in assessing the fracture risk of elderly patients with T2DM in the mainland of China. Methods A total of 267 T2DM and 359 non-diabetic (control) patients were randomly selected, completed a questionnaire survey, underwent bone mineral density measurement, and were assessed by FRAX model. Binary regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for high-risk fracture predicted by FRAX model. Results The body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio, and the proportions of smoking and drinking were all higher in the T2DM group than those in the control group (P<0.001). The bone mineral content, T value, and Z value of femoral neck (FN) and lumbar vertebra (L) in the T2DM group were also high. The T2DM group showed lower risks of 10-year major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) by FRAX-BMI model than the control group [(4.27±2.84)% vs. (5.14±2.92)%, P<0.001, and (1.42±1.54)% vs. (1.83±2.23)%, P<0.001]. The T2DM group also showed a lower risk of MOF by FRAX-BMD model than the control group [(5.28±4.41)% vs. (6.30±5.10)%, P<0.001]. Regression analysis results showed that the T score of FN, smoking, family history of hip fracture, and glucocorticoid use were associated with high-risk HF. The T score of FN, smoking, family history of HF, and history of brittle fracture were associated with high-risk MOF. T2DM was not associated with high-risk fracture predicted by the FRAX model. Conclusion The FRAX model predicts a lower 10-year fracture risk in elderly Chinese patients with T2DM than in non-diabetic patients, indicating that the model is not well suited for the Chinese population.

Key words: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Fracture risk, Bone mineral density, Fracture risk assessment tool

中图分类号: