《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊

Surgical Research and New Technique ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1): 42-44.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2021.01.012

• Original article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical comparison of low-temperature plasma radiofrequency operation and high-frequency electrosurgical resection in treatment of early tongue cancer

YAN Guoxin, REN Hang   

  1. Department of Stomatology, Wuxi Second People's Hospital, Wuxi 214002, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2020-07-30 Published:2021-05-18

Abstract: Objective To compare between low-temperature plasma radiofrequency surgery and high-frequency electrosurgical resection in the treatment of early tongue cancer. Methods Forty-eight patients with early tongue cancer treated from January 2010 to January 2015 were selected as study subjects and divided into a control group (n=24) and an observation group (n=24) by a double-blind method. The control group was treated by high-frequency electrosurgical resection, and the observation group was treated by low-temperature plasma radiofrequency surgery. The intraoperative blood loss amount, the degree of pain at different time points after operation [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], the rate of wound bleeding 6 months after operation, and the recurrence rate 5 months after operation were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss amount of the observation group was significantly less than that of the control group (P<0.05); the VAS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group 1, 3, and 5 d after surgery (P<0.05); the differences in postoperative wound bleeding rate and recurrence rate between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Low-temperature plasma radiofrequency surgery for early tongue cancer patients can reduce intraoperative blood loss amount and relieve postoperative pain.

Key words: Early tongue cancer, low-temperature plasma radiofrequency surgery, high-frequency electrosurgical resection, blood loss amount, recurrence rate

CLC Number: