Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of natural ori-fice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for internal hemorrhoids with rectal mucosal prolapse. Methods A total of 100 patients with internal hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to January 2024 were selected and divided into a control group and a study group by random number table method, with 50 patients in each group. The control group underwent traditional laparoscopic surgery, while the observation group underwent NOSES. Surgical related indicators [operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative hospital stay], preoperative and postoperative Wexner constipation scores, and postoperative complications (hematochezia, fever, and urinary retention) were compared between the two groups. Result There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding between the two groups (P>0.05). The study group had significantly longer operation time, lower postoperative pain (VAS) scores, and shorter hospital stay than the control group (P<0.05). Compared with before surgery, both groups showed a significant decrease in Wexner constipation scores 8 weeks after surgery (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the two groups 8 weeks after surgery (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05), and there was no recurrence in either group during the 6-month follow-up after surgery. Conclusion NOSES for internal hemorrhoids with rectal mucosal prolapse has significant advantages in reducing postoperative pain and shortening hospital stay, with no recurrence rate, providing a safe and effective new treatment option for clinical practice.
YANG Yuanfeng
,
ZHANG Hongming
. Efficacy and safety of natural ori-fice specimen extraction surgery for internal hemorrhoids with rectal mucosal prolapse[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2025
, 14(1)
: 57
-60
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2025.01.013
[1] 张智,许丽玲,邓达宏. 内镜下胶圈套扎联合复方角菜酸脂栓治疗内痔Ⅱ、Ⅲ期的疗效研究[J]. 外科研究与新技术,2023,12(1):50-52.
[2] Percalli L, Passalia L, Pricolo R, Riccò M.Pre-operative assessment of internal mucosal rectal prolapse in internal hemorrhoids: technical details and results from a single institution[J]. Acta Biomed, 2019, 90(2): 308-315.
[3] 陈飞帆,祁禹含,彭瑾博,等. 直肠黏膜脱垂综合征治疗的研究进展[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2024,21(4):192-195.
[4] 中国NOSES联盟,中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会NOSES专委会,王锡山. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术专家共识(2017)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2017,6(4):266-272.
[5] 任东林. 中国痔病诊疗指南(2020)[J]. 结直肠肛门外科,2020,26(5):519-533.
[6] 美国结直肠外科医师协会标准化工作委员会. 直肠脱垂诊治指南[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(7):755-757.
[7] 严广斌. 视觉模拟评分法[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2014,8(2):34-34.
[8] 唐瑞雪,梁延洋,武祖印,等. 经自然腔道取标本手术在直肠脱垂治疗中的应用及近期疗效分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2024,29(3):205-209.
[9] 张昭,焦晨蒙,李明森,等. 直肠脱垂外科治疗新进展[J]. 中国肛肠病杂志,2022,42(6):62-65.
[10] McNevin MS. Evaluation and management of rectal prolapse[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2024, 104(3): 557-564.
[11] Lee SH.Changing trend of rectal prolapse surgery in the era of the minimally invasive surgery[J]. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019, 22(4): 135-136.