《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
Original article

Comparison of ciprofol versus propofol combined with alfentanil in endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric masses

  • YUAN Bo ,
  • WU Qian ,
  • SUN Geqin ,
  • LIU Ling
Expand
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Torch Development Zone People's Hospital, Zhongshan 528437, China

Received date: 2024-11-04

Abstract

Objective To investigate of the application value of ciprofol combined with alfentanil in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric masses. Methods Sixty patients who underwent gastric mass ESD from January 2023 to January 2024 were selected and randomly divided into a ciprofol anesthesia group (experimental group) and a propofol anesthesia group (control group) using a random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. In the control group, anesthesia was induced using 2 mg/kg propofol, 20 μg/kg alfentanil, and 0.15 mg cisatracurium, and maintained with 5 mg/(kg·h) propofol and 0.5 μg/(kg·min) alfentanil. In the experimental group, anesthesia was induced using 0.4 mg/kg ciprofol, 20 μg/kg alfentanil, and 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium, and maintained with 1 mg/(kg·h) ciprofol and 0.5 μg/(kg·min) alfentanil. Comparisons were made between the two groups for hemodynamic indicators including non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), and partial pressure of end tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2), surgical indicators (including extubation time, eye opening time, and agitation score), and serum norepinephrine (NE) and cortisol (Cor) levels. Results At the time of entering the operation room (T0), there was no significant difference in NIBP, HR, SpO2, and PetCO2 between the two groups (P>0.05). After induction (T1), at tracheal intubation (T2), and after tracheal extubation (T3), NIBP, HR, and SpO2 decreased significantly while PetCO2 increased, and compared with the control group, the experimental group had significantly higher NIBP, HR, and SpO2 and significantly lower PetCO2P<0.05). When leaving the operation room (T4), NIBP, HR, and SpO2 increased, while PetCO2 decreased, and the experimental group was better than the control group (P<0.05). The extubation time, eye opening time, and agitation score of the experimental group were all lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of NE and Cor at T0 between the two groups (P>0.05), while the levels of NE and Cor at T1 and T4 increased significantly in both groups, and the levels of NE and Cor in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with propofol combined with alfentanil, the combination of ciprofol and alfentanil in ESD surgery for gastric masses can effectively reduce hemodynamics, downregulate NE and Cor expression, shorten the time for extubation and eye opening, and alleviate patient agitation.

Cite this article

YUAN Bo , WU Qian , SUN Geqin , LIU Ling . Comparison of ciprofol versus propofol combined with alfentanil in endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric masses[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2025 , 14(2) : 135 -138 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2025.02.008

References

[1] 胡双燕,胡君凤,毛琳玲,等. 瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于无痛胃肠镜检查后对精神运动功能恢复的影响[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学,2024,29(10):1168-1173.
[2] 黄辉民,夏艳春,包树臻. 丙泊酚靶控输注复合阿芬太尼对声带息肉摘除术患者的麻醉效果和血流动力学的影响分析[J]. 中国现代医生,2024,62(26):20-23.
[3] 应晓丹. 纳布啡复合丙泊酚泵注用于肠道经内镜黏膜下剥离术患者的效果[J]. 河南外科学杂志,2023,29(1):134-136.
[4] 应晓丹. 舒芬太尼联合瑞芬太尼麻醉诱导用于内镜黏膜下剥离术的效果[J]. 河南外科学杂志,2022,28(5):172-174.
[5] 冯兴龙,蒲军成,赵星,等. 舒芬太尼联合瑞芬太尼麻醉诱导在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用[J]. 川北医学院学报,2021,36(12):1593-1596.
[6] 刘传辉,韦宝石,邱庆明,等. 纳布啡联合丙泊酚对行肠道内镜黏膜下剥离术患者血流动力学和应激反应的影响[J]. 中国药业,2020,29(6):142-145.
Outlines

/