Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of holmium laser lithotripsy combined with ordinary flexible ureteroscope sheath and flexible negative pressure suction sheath for urinary system stones. Methods A total of 120 patients with urinary system stones who underwent treatment in our hospital from April 2023 to August 2025 were selected. All study subjects were divided into two groups based on different treatment methods, namely an observation group (holmium laser lithotripsy combined with flexible negative pressure suction sheath) and a control group (holmium laser lithotripsy combined with ordinary flexible ureteroscope sheath), with 60 cases in each group. Surgical indicators, stone clearance rate, postoperative pain level [visual analog scale (VAS) score], inflammation indicators (white blood cell count, C-reactive protein), and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups of patients. Results The surgical time, sheath insertion time, and sheath removal time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05); the one-time stone clearance rate of the observation group patients was significantly higher than that of the control group (P>0.05); the postoperative residual stone rate, VAS score, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, and total incidence rate of complications of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The combination of flexible negative pressure suction sheath and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy can improve surgical efficiency and stone clearance rate, reduce postoperative pain and inflammatory response, and lower the incidence of complications in the treatment of urinary system stones, showing good safety and significant clinical application value.
LIU Tuan
. Comparative study on clinical efficacy of holmium laser lithotripsy with ordinary flexible ureteroscope sheath and flexible negative pressure suction sheath in treatment of urinary system stones[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2026
, 15(1)
: 35
-38
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2026.01.008
[1] 李星佟,陆志峰.普通软镜鞘与可弯曲负压吸引鞘结合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗泌尿系统结石的效果对比[J].大医生,2025,10(6):45-47.
[2] 宁晨,周厚宇,韩威,等.可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜治疗老年人上尿路结石的疗效及安全性评估[J].中国现代医学杂志,2025,35(11):72-77.
[3] 钟恩鹏,陈新铭,江沛源.可弯曲负压吸引鞘在输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗肾结石中的应用研究[J].中国医学创新,2024,21(31):62-66.
[4] 李强,周国民.可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜一期治疗单侧肾结石的疗效分析[J].中文科技期刊数据库(引文版)医药卫生,2023(6):67-69.
[5] 吴小将,田文俊,郑达闻,等.可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗直径2~3 cm上尿路结石的临床研究[J].中华全科医学,2023,21(9):1516-1519.
[6] 卿楠. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗肾结石的效果[J].中外医学研究,2025,23(16):20-23.
[7] 高翔,张洪波,张大坤,等.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗不同大小及位置上尿路结石的疗效与安全性分析[J].临床外科杂志,2025,33(5):523-526.
[8] 彭华林. 健侧卧奔跑位输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术联合可弯曲负压吸引鞘在肾、输尿管上段结石患者治疗中的应用研究[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2025,9(17):32-34.
[9] 刘辉,魏勇,高海峰,等.一期输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术联合可弯曲负压吸引鞘治疗>2 cm肾结石合并尿路感染的疗效观察[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2025,40(3):284-288.
[10] 王锦明. 前端可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗上尿路结石的效果[J].中外医药研究,2025,4(12):43-45.