Objective To compare the clinical effects of mini-plate internal fixation versus screw internal fixation on ankle fracture.Methods A total of 80 patients with posterior malleolus fracture treated in our hospital from January 2015 to June 2017 were randomly divided into two groups: mini-plate group and lag screw group, with 40 cases in each group.By using different internal fixation methods, the clinical efficacy, operation time, and fracture healing time of the two groups were compared, and the Baird-Jackson scores and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared after one-year follow-up.Results The effective rate of the group with lag screw fixation was 97.50%, which was higher than that of the group with mini-plate fixation (92.5%), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).The operation time and fracture healing time of the group with lag screw fixation were significantly less than those of the group with mini-plate fixation (P<0.05).After one year of follow-up, the Baird-Jackson score of the group with lag screw fixation was significantly higher than that of the group with mini-plate fixation(P<0.05).There were no obvious adverse reactions in both groups.Conclusion Both lag screw internal fixation and mini-plate internal fixation are effective in the treatment of posterior ankle fracture, but there are differences between the two methods in operation effect and recovery.Therefore, it is necessary to take into account of the fracture condition of patients when making internal fixation schemes for posterior ankle fracture.
YE Junjie
,
HU Boyong
,
LU Xihong
,
WANG Yuegui
. Comparison of curative effects of mini-plate internal fixation versus screw internal fixation on posterior ankle fracture[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2019
, 8(1)
: 17
-20
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2019.01.006
[1] 张云航,李海平,叶树强.探讨不同内固定方式对不同后踝关节骨折的生物效果及临床疗效[J].中国伤残医学, 2017,25(9):68-69.
[2] Bullen M, Lang C, Tran P.Incidence of complex regional pain syndrome Ⅰ following foot and ankle fractures using the Budapest criteria[J].Pain Med, 2016,17(12):2353-2359.
[3] Erdem MN, Erken HY, Burc H, et al.Comparison of lag screw versus Buttress plate fixation of posterior malleolar fractures[J].Foot Ankle Int, 2014,35(10):1022-1030.
[4] 万全会.后踝关节骨折不同内固定方式的生物力学性能对比[J].中国组织工程研究, 2015,19(48):7806-7810.
[5] 陈雁西,张坤,强敏菲,等.后踝骨折对关节面损伤程度影响的三维形态学评估及其临床意义[J].中华创伤杂志, 2015,31(2):111-116.
[6] 陈喜顺,贾铭.闭合复位经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗旋后-外旋型踝关节骨折[J].临床误诊误治, 2017,30(12):64-67.
[7] 谢建新,余建,邵强,等.两种方法治疗伴后踝骨折的踝关节骨折疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志, 2017,20(2):214-216.
[8] 施继飞,李泽湘,刘凡,等.后踝骨折手术复位内固定的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节外科, 2014,7(5):387-390.
[9] 戚晓冬.微型钢板内固定治疗后踝大块骨折的疗效及对踝关节功能的影响[J].河北医药, 2017,39(6):891-893.
[10] Shibuya N, Frost CH, Campbell JD, et al.Incidence of acute deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in foot and ankle trauma: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank[J].J Foot Ankle Surg, 2012,51(1):63-68.
[11] 王拯,张良,邱少东,等.三种固定方式治疗后踝骨折效果比较[J].宁夏医科大学学报, 2016,38(5):578-581.
[12] Roukis TS, Meusnier t, Augoyard M, et al.Incidence of nonunion of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis for severe hallux valgus using crossed, flexible titanium intramedullary nails and a dorsal static staple with immediate weightbearing in female patients[J].J Foot Ankle Surg, 2012,51(4):433-436.
[13] 彭义,曲家富,曹立海.钢板与螺钉内固定对后踝关节骨折患者的疗效及IL-6、IL-8 和CRP 的影响[J].中国临床研究, 2017,30(6):816-818.
[14] Liporace FA, Yoon RS.An adjunct to percutaneous plate insertion to obtain optimal sagittal plane alignment in the treatment of pilon fractures[J].J Foot Ankle Surg, 2012,51(2):275-277.
[15] 许闯,娄德全,陈江宁,等.两种固定方法治疗后踝大块骨折疗效分析[J].临床军医杂志, 2017,45(12):1293-1296.
