《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
Original article

Clinical observation of celecoxib preemptive analgesia for painless abortion

  • MA Yanfeng ,
  • XU Jiliang ,
  • PENG Sheng
Expand
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Seventh People’s Hospital of Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai 200137, China

Received date: 2017-10-30

  Online published: 2019-12-10

Abstract

Objective To observe the clinical effect of celecoxib preemptive analgesia for painless abortion.Methods Eighty pregnant women in early pregnancy were randomly divided into celecoxib group (treatment group) and control group, 40 cases in each group.Treatment Group received oral celecoxib 400 mg at 2 h before operation for preemptive analgesia, while control group did not.Both groups were given intravenous fentanyl 0.05 mg + propofol 2.0 mg/kg, followed by propofol as needed.BP, HR, SPO2, and RR were recorded before anesthesia (T0), at disappearance of consciousness (T1), at cervix expansion (T2), at opening eyes by prompting (T3), and at 1h after operation (T4); induction time, recovery time, intraoperative total propofol dosage, intraoperative limb movement, glossoptosis, respiratory depression, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative pain and other adverse reactions were recorded; VRS pain scores at 15, 30, and 60 min after surgery were recorded.Results There were no significant differences in BP, HR, SPO2, and RR at the 5 time points (P>0.05).Treatment Group patients’ anesthesia recovery time was significantly shorter than that of control group patients’, and the total propofol dosage was less (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05).In treatment group, the incidence rates of glossoptosis and respiratory depression were significantly lower than those in control group (P<0.05).The pain scores of VRS in treatment group were significantly lower than those in control group at different time points after waking up (P<0.05).Conclusion Celecoxib preemptive analgesia for painless abortion can reduce intraoperative propofol dosage and postoperative pain, while not increase blood loss and the incidence of respiratory depression or other adverse reactions.

Cite this article

MA Yanfeng , XU Jiliang , PENG Sheng . Clinical observation of celecoxib preemptive analgesia for painless abortion[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2018 , 7(2) : 105 -107 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2018.02.007

References

[1] Steinberg AC, Schimpf MO, White AB, et al.Preemptive analgesia for postoperative hysterectomy pain control:systematic review and clinical practice guidelines[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017,217(3):303-313.
[2] 孙晓群,鄂道华,金国兰,等.塞来昔布超前镇痛在腹腔镜术后镇痛的效果[J].江苏医药, 2015,41(13):1526-1528.
[3] Papageorgiou N, Zacharia E, Briasoulis A, et al.Celecoxib for the treatment of atherosclerosis[J].Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2016,25(5):619-633.
[4] Dhondt L, Devreese M, Croubels S, et al.Comparative population pharmacokinetics and absolute oral bioavailability of COX-2 selective inhibitors celecoxib, mavacoxib and meloxicam in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) [J].Sci Rep, 2017,7(1):12043-12055.
[5] Gao W, Sha B, Zhao Y, et al.Comparison of simultaneous and sequential administration of fentanyl-propofol for surgical abortion: a randomized single-blinded controlled trial [J].Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol, 2017,5(5):1045-1050.
[6] Yang Z, Yi B.Patient experience of sexual hallucinations after propofol-induced painless abortion may lead to violence against medical personnel[J].J Anesth, 2016,30(3):486-488.
[7] 郭宗儒.塞来昔布和 COX-2 选择性抑制剂[J].药学学报,2016,51(6):1010-1016.
Outlines

/