Objective To investigate the difference of curative effect between electro-resection and electro-fulguration on female cystitis glandularis.Methods Female glandular cystitis patients who were hospitalized in Suzhou Jiulong Hospital were selected, including 42 patients undergoing transurethral electro-fulguration (control group) and 70 patients undergoing transurethral electro-resection (observation group).Postoperative follow-up data and differences in efficacy were compared.Results There were no significant differences in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and indwelling catheter time between the two groups (P>0.05).The number of urination and urinary urgency at 24 h after operation were lower than those before operation (P<0.05), and the number of urination and urinary urgency were lower in the observation group than those in the control group at 24 h after operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05).However, the postoperative cure rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).In the electro-fulguration group, the symptom remission rate was higher than that in the electro-resection group within 1 month after surgery.However, the total remission rate of the resection group was higher in the electro-fulguration group (P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the levels of Survivin and P53 between the two groups before operation.The postoperative positive rate in each group was lower than that before surgery (P<0.05).The levels of Survivin and P53 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion For female cystitis glandularis, transurethral electro-resection is better and worthy of further clinical promotion.
GU Qing
,
ZHAO Xiping
,
WANG Xizhi
. Efficacy comparison of electro-resection and electro- fulguration for cystitis glandularis in female[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2018
, 7(3)
: 187
-190
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2018.03.010
[1] 谢进东,陈烈钳,岳巍巍,等.经尿道膀胱黏膜电切术联合膀胱化疗药物治疗腺性膀胱炎的疗效观察[J].中国癌症防治杂志, 2017,9(2):149-152.
[2] 高峰.两种手术方法治疗女性腺性膀胱炎效果研究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017,17(54):129.
[3] 李小辉,魏澎涛,韩兴涛,等.经尿道膀胱黏膜电切术与膀胱颈电切术治疗腺性膀胱炎的临床观察[J].中国继续医学教育, 2016,8(12):100-101.
[4] 刘政江,黄明亮,苟举民.腺性膀胱炎97例诊断与治疗体会[J].实用医药杂志, 2016,33(10):886-887.
[5] 罗博,赵小洲,陆林本,等.2μm激光气化切除术与电切术治疗腺性膀胱炎的临床疗效[J].中国激光医学杂志, 2014,23(5):257.
[6] 周峰,汪超军,刘犇,等.经尿道等离子电切术治疗女性腺性膀胱炎(附97例报告)[J].微创泌尿外科杂志, 2014,3(4):227-229.
[7] 赖必南,陈启富,李涛,等.经尿道电切和电灼术治疗女性腺性膀胱炎的疗效比较[J].福建医药杂志, 2013,35(6):105-107.
[8] 宋亚辉,李鹏程,廖然,等.Survivin 在腺性膀胱炎与膀胱腺癌中的表达及临床意义[J].华夏医学, 2014,27(5):16-19.
[9] 李利军.耳针联合八正散及丝裂霉素膀胱灌注治疗腺性膀胱炎效果及对血清Survivin、p53水平的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志, 2018,27(18):1968-1971.