《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
Orginal article

Clinical observation of 235 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal prosthetic herniorrhaphy

  • LI Guofeng
Expand
  • Department of General Surgery, Luoding Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Luoding 527200, Guangdong, China

Received date: 2020-03-27

  Online published: 2020-09-16

Abstract

Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal prosthetic herniorraphy on unilateral inguinal hernia among 235 patients. Methods A total of 470 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia treated from March 2016 to February 2020 in our hospital were divided into a laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal prosthetic herniorraphy group (observation group) and an open tension-free inguinal hernia repair group (control group) according to different therapies, with 235 cases in each group. Operation conditions, postoperative recurrence rate and complications, and GQOL-74 (Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74) scores of the two groups were evaluated. Results No differences in preoperative VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and GQOL-74 scores were observed between the two groups. The length of hospital stay [(5.45±0.85) d vs. (8.25±1.55)d], postoperative VAS scores (2.54±0.54 vs. 5.25±1.05), time of off?bed activity [(13.52±3.54) h vs. (45.42±4.02)h], postoperative complication rate (3.40% vs. 13.19%), and recurrence rate at 6 months after surgery (2.55% vs. 9.36%) in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05), but the operative time [(73.42±4.36) min vs. (44.52±4.42) min] and postoperative GQOL-74 score were higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal prosthetic herniorraphy for unilateral inguinal hernia can produce higher life quality, less postoperational pain, shorter hospital stay, a lower recurrence rate, and fewer complications, thus it is worthy of application.

Cite this article

LI Guofeng . Clinical observation of 235 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia undergoing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal prosthetic herniorrhaphy[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2020 , 9(2) : 85 -87 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2020.02.004

References

[1] 王帆,靳翠红,赵凤林,等.自固定补片与钉合固定补片在巨大腹股沟疝行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的对比研究[J]. 首都医科大学学报,2017,38(6):911-914.
[2] 计鹏飞. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片植入术与经腹腹膜前补片植入术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效对比[J].健康研究,2018,38(1):73-75.
[3] 李义亮,王志,克力木,等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入术与Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效对比研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2017,20(8):928-931.
[4] 房俊,朱初明.腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前补片植入术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果比较研究[J].临床合理用药杂志,2019,12(21):142-143.
[5] 宋文玖,吕浩鹏,陈建平,等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2019,13(5):461-464.
[6] 孙刚,赵英男,李冬,等.腹股沟疝传统疝修补术、平片及疝环填充无张力疝修补术的临床研究[J]. 临床军医杂志,2015,43(4):348-350.
[7] 马锐,蒋会勇,郭一君,等.腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝的临床分析(附47例报告)[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2017,22(12):949-951.
[8] 赵洁,吴团结,李辉,等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入术与常规无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患者的疗效对比[J].徐州医科大学学报,2019,39(1):26-29.
Outlines

/