Objective To explored the choice of the first cesarean incision and its affection to the secondary caesarean operation.Method 104 cases who had secondary cesarean delivery ,according to the first cesarean sec incision approach,divided into longitudinal incision group 57 cases and crosscutting 47 cases.Compared two groups of secondary laparotomy surgery time,fetal childbirth time,total operative time,intraoperative blood loss; Postoperative newborn Apgar score; Abdominal cavity adhesion degree.Results (1) the longitudinal incision group,fetal childbirth,total operation time in laparotomy and intraoperative blood loss,were significantly lower than that of the crosscutting groups (P<0.05).(2) The Apgar score in two groups was (P>0.05).(3) a longitudinal incision group compared with crosscutting group,degree of formation of celiac adhesion was (P<0.05).Conclusion The second longitudinal incision cesarean surgery is superior to the celiac wall crosscutting,both of them are needed to choose according the actual conditions.
BAO Ju-mei
. Choice of the first cesarean incision and its affection to the secondary one[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2014
, 3(1)
: 38
-40
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2014.01.008
[1] Liu H,Leng J,Shi H,et a1.Expectant treatment of cesarean sear pregn ancy:two case reports and a glimpse at the natural courses[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet.2010,282(4):455-458.
[2] Yang XY,Yu H,Li KM,et a1.Uterine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy[J].BJOG,2010,117(8):990-996.
[3] 陈春霞,叶敏欢.甲氨蝶呤化疗联合宫腔镜手术电切治疗剖宫产切口瘢痕妊娠的临床研究[J].中国现代医生,2011,5(2):142-143.
[4] 杨晓红.剖宫产腹壁横切口与纵切口二次手术临床分析[J].吉林医学,2013,34(4):705-706.
[5] 范玲,黄醒华.再论剖官产术式的选择[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2008,24(10):729.
[6] 张微.腹壁横切口与纵切口对二次剖宫产术的影响比较[J].浙江临床医学,2010,12(12):1361-1362.
[7] 剖宫产术式对再次妇产科手术的影响研究[J].中国实用医药,2013,8(6):114-115.
[8] 张敏燕.不同术式剖宫产术后再次进腹手术86例临床观察.中国实用医药,2009,4(21):68-69.
[9] 宋玉霞.首次剖官产术式对再次剖宫产的影响[J].山东医药,2009,49(38):74-75.
[10] 官翠芬.首次剖宫产腹壁横切口与传统纵切口对二次剖宫产的影响因素分析[J].浙江临床医学,2011,13(5):543-544.
