《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
Original article

Carotid endarterectomy for severe internal carotid artery stenosis: A clinical analysis of 60 cases

  • LIU Bo ,
  • ZHANG Zongqiang ,
  • HE Bo ,
  • HOU Wenjiao
Expand
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Xinjiang Yining Corps Fourth Division Hospital, Yining 835000, Xinjiang, China

Received date: 2021-09-22

  Online published: 2022-12-30

Abstract

Objective To observe and analyze the clinical effect of carotid endarterectomy on severe internal carotid artery stenosis. Methods From March 2018 to March 2021, a total 120 cases of internal carotid artery stenosis admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery of Xinjiang Yining Corps Fourth Division Hospital were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into a control group (n = 60, carotid artery stenting) and an observation group (n = 60, carotid endarterectomy). Cognitive function after operation, quality of life, clinical efficacy, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results Before treatment, there were no significant differences in WHOQOL-BREF score and MoCA score between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the WHOQOL-BREF score and MoCA score of the two groups were improved significantly, and the scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total clinical effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence rate of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Carotid endarterectomy shows an obvious clinical effect on severe internal carotid artery stenosis; it can significantly improve patients’ carotid artery blood supply, cognitive function, and quality of life.

Cite this article

LIU Bo , ZHANG Zongqiang , HE Bo , HOU Wenjiao . Carotid endarterectomy for severe internal carotid artery stenosis: A clinical analysis of 60 cases[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2022 , 11(2) : 87 -89 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2022.02.003

References

[1] 张华, 张淑平, 王小新. 无症状颈动脉狭窄患者认知功能障碍评估及其危险因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2017, 20(17): 2051-2056,2063.
[2] 陈龙华. TCD、CTA、DSA检查颈内动脉狭窄的临床价值分析[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2016, 26(8): 1529-1531.
[3] 胡晨, 董瑞芳, 史方堃, 等. CAS和CEA治疗颈内动脉重度狭窄疗效及对脑血流量、血清miR-145、IGF1R的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2021, 21(6): 1182-1186.
[4] 徐淼, 张喜成, 陈兆雷, 等. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术对颈内动脉重度狭窄患者认知功能的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(8): 1397-1398.
[5] 叶建忠, 张宏伟, 王守利, 等. 颈内动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉硬化狭窄后早期并发症的疗效分析[J]. 系统医学, 2019, 4(5): 93-94+103.
[6] 中华医学会外科学分会血管外科学组. 颈动脉狭窄诊治指南[J]. 中华血管外科杂志, 2017, 2(2): 78-84.
[7] 杨林, 刘建林, 祁光裕, 等. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术和颈动脉支架成形术治疗缺血性脑卒中的中期效果比较:单中心经验[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 10(1): 15-20.
Outlines

/