Objective To study the difficulties and countermeasures of laparoscopic-assisted resection of difficult gallbladder with inflammation and edema. Methods A total of 120 patients with acute cholecystitis admitted to the hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected. They were divided into a minimally invasive group （n=60） and an open group （n=60） by single and double digit method. Conventional open cholecystectomy was performed in the open group, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy （LC） was performed in the minimally invasive group. The surgical indicators, postoperative complications, serum CRP, white blood cell count, and percentage of granulocytes were compared between the two groups. Results In the minimally invasive group, the operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, intestinal sound recovery time, anal exhaust time, indwelling drainage tube time, and hospital stay were （61.89±3.56） min, （30.79±2.16） mL, （17.89±2.47） h, （23.86±1.89） h, （2.45±0.51） d, and （4.72±0.75） d, respectively, which were lower than those in the open group, （80.03±6.18） min, （42.12±2.49） mL, （32.12±3.69） h, （40.57±4.26） h, （3.66±0.72） d, and （7.06±0.94） d, respectively （all P<0.05）. The total incidence of complications in the minimally invasive group was lower than that in the open group （3.33% vs. 13.33%） （P<0.05）. There were no significant differences in serum CRP, white blood cell count, and percentage of granulocytes between the two groups 1 d before operation （all P>0.05）. One day after surgery, the serum CRP, white blood cell count, and percentage of granulocytes in the minimally invasive group were （32.84±4.19） mg/L, （12.46±2.30）×109/L, and （77.86±7.28）%, respectively, lower than those in the open group, （51.78±6.26） mg/L, （15.17±3.06）×109/L, and （83.47±8.09）%, respectively （all P<0.05）. Conclusion Laparoscopic-assisted resection of difficult gallbladder with inflammation and edema has a significant effect, which can promote the early recovery of patients, reduce the risk of postoperative complications, and reduce inflammatory reaction.
LIAO Weiming
,
CHEN Yingju
,
MO Pengshi
,
LIANG Yonghui
,
LIU Da
. Analysis on difficulties and countermeasures of laparoscopic-assisted resection of difficult gallbladder with inflammation and edema[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2023
, 12(2)
: 96
-99
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2023.02.005
[1] 杨瑞军,白筱晞.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的效果及对炎症因子及血清淀粉酶水平的影响[J].贵州医药,2020,44(4):579-580.
[2] 李冬冬,江涛,周绍荣,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的疗效及安全性分析[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2019,31(8):493-495.
[3] 赵国平,胡建平,王吉荣,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术洽疗86例急性结石性胆囊炎息者的临床效果[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2018,34(3):517-520.
[4] 刘景平,万智恒,李海燕.急性结石性胆囊炎早期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹的相关因素分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2020,25(10):757-760.
[5] 薛伟佳,张灿,王静,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石合并急性胆囊炎的疗效及对免疫功能和生活质量的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2022,22(10):1914-1918.
[6] 李正臣,刘养岁,倪忠鹏,等.免结扎胆囊动脉主干技术在急性结石性胆囊炎患者中的应用体会[J].徐州医科大学学报,2019,39(9):667-669.
[7] 高洪强,张俊杰,李钢.免气腹腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的临床效果及对炎症因子水平的影响[J].医学临床研究,2021,38(1):107-109.
[8] 周保东,吴长安.结石性胆囊炎急性发作患者在不同时机进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的效果对比[J].山西医药杂志,2021,50(10):1648-1650.
[9] 冯学军,黄晓龙.分析腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎对患者临床效果与肠胃功能的影响[J].贵州医药,2021,45(5):703-704.
[10] 王连忠,段荣欣,沈慧欣.急性结石性胆囊炎行小切口胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2021,26(2):128-131.
[11] 王剑,王洁,陈春燕.疏肝利胆汤联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的疗效及对血清IL-6和TNF-α水平的影响[J].中华中医药学刊,2019,37(5):1178-1181.
[12] 陈光裕,周小月,李鹏,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术对急性结石性胆囊炎患者术后炎症因子及血清淀粉酶水平的影响[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版),2019,20(2):208-212.
[13] 汪昱,徐建明,莫玲斐.急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术后并发症的危险因素分析及风险预测模型的建立[J].安徽医药,2022,26(10):2068-2071.
[14] 景化忠. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合腹腔镜下胆总管探查一期缝合术在急性胆囊炎合并胆囊结石胆总管结石患者疗效观察[J].山西医药杂志,2022,51(1):75-77.
