Objective To observe the difference in curative effects between surgical treatment and conservative treatment on distal radius fracture.Methods The hospitalized patients with distal radius fractures were randomly divided into a conservative treatment group and a surgical treatment group.Comparisons in the pain levels of fracture site and ulnar wrist and the medical imaging evaluation results were made between the two groups.Results The surgical treatment group showed a lower score of VAS pain in fracture site and ulnar wrist and a higher excellent and good rate of imaging evaluation than the conservative group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Surgical treatment for distal radius fractures is more effective than conservative treatment,with less postoperative pain and improved fixation effect,thus is worthy of clinical promotion.
GU Junfeng
,
DAI Xiaoqing
,
WENG Xian
. Clinical observation of conservative treatment and surgical treatment for distal radius fracture[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2017
, 6(4)
: 256
-258
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2017.04.008
[1] 张琦,王浩然,王维山.手术与保守治疗不稳定型桡骨远端骨折临床疗效比较[J].济宁医学院学报,2016,39(2):97-100.
[2] 俞军卫,吴成如,廖国权,等.老年桡骨远端骨折手术与非手术治疗的临床对照评价[J].安徽医学,2016,37(1):71-73.
[3] 梁志强,李伟,王增星.不稳定桡骨远端骨折采取保守治疗与手术治疗的疗效比较[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(13):129-131.
[4] 杨颇,李青松,秦杰,等.手术治疗不稳定性桡骨远端骨折96例疗效观察[J].贵州医药,2013(11):1005-1006.
[5] 黄平,黄东永.桡骨远端骨折保守治疗与手术治疗的疗效比较[J].河北医药,2015,37(21):3266-3268.
[6] 姜新华,于国平,董卫星.桡骨远端骨折保守治疗与手术治疗疗效对比分析[J].海军医学杂志,2015,36(4):321-323,328.
[7] 黄海,王万忠,付启桥,等.手术治疗老年桡骨远端不稳定型骨折36例分析[J].贵州医药,2014(9):830-832.
[8] Lebailly F,Zemirline A,Facca S,et al.Distal radius fixation through a mini- invasive approach of 15 mm.PART 1:a series of 144 cases[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2014,24(6):877-890.
