Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopic surgery on adhesive intestinal obstruction. Methods A total of 120 patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were selected as study subjects and divided into open group （60 cases） and laparoscopic group （60 cases） according to the surgery they received. The surgery effects were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, exhaustion time, ambulation time, and hospitalization time in the laparoscopic group were significantly shorter than those in the open group （P<0.05）, while the amount of bleeding during operation was significantly less （P<0.05）, and the incidence of complications was significantly lower （P<0.05）, in the laparoscopic group than those in the open group. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is safe and reliable for adhesive intestinal obstruction as it can shorten operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications, and promote postoperative rehabilitation.
CHEN Ze
,
CHEN Qiang
. Effect of laparoscopic surgery on adhesive intestinal obstruction[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2020
, 9(3)
: 180
-182
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2020.03.009
[1] 姜启永. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性粘连性肠梗阻的疗效对比研究[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(9):678-680.
[2] 王展福,胡勇坚,李健,等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的疗效对比[J].广西医学,2016,38(6):873-874.
[3] 汪洋. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的临床对比研究[J].心血管外科杂志(电子版),2019,8(3):72.
[4] 魏守钦,郑娟.慢性粘连性肠梗阻患者应用腹腔镜手术治疗的效果分析[J].中外医学研究,2019,17(24):13-16.
[5] 吴在德,吴肇汉.外科学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:480.
[6] 杨超,陈华,钟源波.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻68例临床效果对比研究[J].中国医药导刊,2014,16(5):806-807.
[7] 苏威强,王银中,刘晓.探究腹腔镜微创手术在粘连性肠梗阻治疗中的临床疗效与安全性[J].首都食品与医药,2019,26(8):42-43.
[8] 齐李强,常喜宅.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的对比分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2019,6(39):86.
[9] 牛增志. 腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗急性粘连性肠梗阻的临床效果[J].中国医学工程,2018,26(6):75-77.
[10] 黄许森,陈小勋,黄海舸,等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性粘连性肠梗阻的远期疗效观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2014,20(5):311-314.
