Objective To investigate the effect of single-port laparoscopic-assisted total vaginal hysterectomy. Methods Sixty patients who underwent total hysterectomy in our hospital from January 2018 to April 2021 were selected and divided into an observation group （n=29） and a control group （n=31） according to the operation method. The observation group received single-port laparoscopic-assisted total vaginal hysterectomy, while the control group received traditional total vaginal hysterectomy. The operation conditions, Self-rating Anxiety Scale （SAS） score, Self-rating Depression Scale （SDS） score, Female Sexual Function Scale （FSFI） score, and Visual Analogue Scale （VAS） score were observed and recorded of the two groups, and the levels of serum estradiol （E2）, follicular hormone （FSH）, and luteinizing hormone （LH） were examined before and after operation. Results The operation time and postoperative exhaust time in the observation group were （93.90±11.17） min and （29.50±3.12） min, respectively, which were significantly longer than those in the control group （P<0.05）. The VAS scores of the observation group immediately, 1 d, and 3 d after surgery were （4.10±0.97）, （2.50±0.83）, and （1.80±0.53） points, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of the control group （P<0.05）. The postoperative SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were （35.56±4.98） and （33.87±5.95） points, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of the control group （P<0.05）. The FSFI score of the observation group 3 months after operation was （26.19±5.01） points, which was significantly higher than that of the control group （P<0.05）. At 3 months after operation, the E2 level in the observation group was （98.87±9.26） ng/L, which was significantly higher than that in the control group （P<0.05）, while the FSH and LH levels were （8.21±1.41） U/L and （11.31±2.03） U/L, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group （P<0.05）. Conclusion Single-port laparoscopic-assisted total vaginal hysterectomy has a good effect, producing low negative emotion and little influence on sexual life and ovarian function of patients.
LIN Yanzhen
,
HE Junyi
,
MAI Yanhong
. Effect of single-port laparoscopic-assisted total vaginal hysterectomy[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2022
, 11(2)
: 115
-119
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2022.02.011
[1] 张弛远,高山,陈英汉,等.改良腹腔镜全子宫切除术的临床应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(4):311-313,321.
[2] 原昕,孟凡东.腹腔镜下广泛性子宫切除术治疗子宫颈鳞状细胞癌的临床疗效[J].中国医科大学学报,2019,48(1):54-58.
[3] 龚瑶,周容,代雪林,等.自制入路通道单孔腹腔镜手术治疗妇科良性疾病60例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2019,35(3):78-81.
[4] 杨立,徐臻,任琛琛,等.吲哚菁绿荧光显影在单孔腹腔镜下深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症病灶切除术中的应用[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2020,55(3):426-430.
[5] 高京海,刘晓军,金志军,等.机器人手术系统辅助的经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗早期子宫内膜癌八例临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2019,54(4):266-268.
[6] Wada T, Enomoto M, Kasahara K, et al.A case of robot-assisted laparoscopic lower anterior resection and total hysterectomy with transvaginal NOSE[J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2019, 46(13): 2113-2115.
[7] Mustea A, Holthaus B, H Elmeligy, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy as endoscopic single-station surgery and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy—surgical effects on safety and quality of life[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2019, 16(1): 9.
[8] 黄晓斌,谢庆煌,柳晓春,等.单孔腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结切除联合阴式广泛子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌[J].中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(6):512-514.
[9] 刘青,关小明.单孔腹腔镜在妇科中的应用现状及发展[J].实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(3):6-8.
[10] 王丽娜,张明乐,杜彦芳,等.单孔腹腔镜联合阴道造穴乙状结肠代阴道成形术治疗先天性无阴道患者的可行性研究[J].实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(4):67-70.
[11] 刘思伟,李元宏,张勇,等.无入路平台经脐单切口腹腔镜与传统多孔腹腔镜行全子宫切除术的临床效果比较[J].实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(2):80-83.
[12] 陈梦越,吴昌菊,王延洲,等.达芬奇机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜在子宫内膜癌全面分期术中的应用[J].重庆医科大学学报,2020,45(12):10-14.
[13] 王罕瑾,蒋本贵.经阴道与经脐单孔腹腔镜在子宫肌瘤手术中的应用比较[J].中国内镜杂志, 2020,26(12):66-71.
[14] 朱其舟,舒宽勇,龙生根,等.常规器械单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(2):104-106.
[15] 庄良武,吕新萍,陈捷.增加辅助孔的经脐单孔腹腔镜巨大卵巢囊肿手术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(4):314-317.
