《中国期刊全文数据库》收录期刊
《中国核心期刊(遴选)数据库》收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊

Surgical Research and New Technique ›› 2017, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3): 162-164.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2017.03.005

• Original article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative analysis of laparotomy and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection in treatment of stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ low rectal cancer

LIANG Bingying   

  1. Department of General Surgery,Wuxi Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Wuxi 214194,China
  • Received:2017-05-15 Published:2019-12-11

Abstract: Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effects of laparotomy and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) in the preservation of rectal cancer at stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ.Methods A total of 70 patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ low rectal cancer were selected from Department of General Surgery and randomly divided into an observational group (laparotomy ISR) and a control group (laparoscopic ISR).The clinical indicators,incidence rate of postoperative complications,and recurrence rate between the two groups were compared.Results The observation group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss volume[(94.68±18.76) mL vs.(203.22±35.18) mL],shorter first anal exsufflation time[(1.21±0.36) d vs.(2.18±0.67) d],and shorter hospital stay[(9.54±1.39) d vs.(12.73±1.52) d] than the control group (P<0.05),but no differences in operation time and the number of lymph node dissection were observed.The incidence rate of postoperative complications (11.43% vs.37.14%) and recurrence rate (5.71% vs.22.86%) in the observation group were also significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with laparotomy ISR,laparoscopic ISR has a better clinical therapeutic effect and lower postoperative complication rate and recurrence rate;therefore,it is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Laparotomy, Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection, Low rectal cancer

CLC Number: