腹膜前间隙无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效观察

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-378X.2018.03.006

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To observe and compare the effect of tension-free repair in preperitoneal space and hernia ring-retaining tension-free repair on inguinal hernia.Methods Patients who underwent tension-free repair in preperitoneal space (observation group) and hernia ring-retaining tension-free repair (control group) were retrospectively analyzed for surgery conditions, postoperative pain scores, complications, and recurrence.Results No difference in operation time was found between the two groups.However, intraoperative blood loss, leaving bed time, and hospital stay of the observation group were significantly less and shorter than those of the control group (P<0.05).The pain scores at 6h,12h,and 24h of the observation group was better than those of the control group (P<0.05).The postoperative complication rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (7.5% vs.25.0%, P<0.05).None of the patients in the two groups recurred in the one-year follow-up visit.Conclusion Tension-free repair in preperitoneal space for inguinal hernia is more safer and effective than hernia ring-retaining tension-free repair,thus worthy of clinical recommendation.

Key words: Preperitoneal space, Tension-free repair, Hernia, Efficacy

CLC Number:

R 656

WU Haifeng, ZHANG Zihua, LI Hengjian. Therapeutic effect of tension-free repair in preperitoneal space on inguinal hernia[J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2018, 7(3): 174-177.

References

[1] 郑金凯.腹膜前间隙与疝环充填式无张力修补术式治疗腹股沟斜疝临床疗效[J].吉林医学, 2015,36(4):671-672.
[2] Read RC.Crucial steps in the evolution of the preperitoneal approaches to the groin: an historical review[J].Hernia,2011,15(1):1-5.
[3] 立全晰.腹膜前间隙无张力修补术治疗疝气的临床效果观察[J].中国当代医药, 2015,22(14):41-45.
[4] 贾长辉.前入路腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝95例临床分析[J].山东医药, 2015,55(37):94-95.
[5] 罗刚,丁金火,陈劲强,等.前入路腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝180例[J].江西医药, 2015,50(11):1196-1197.
[6] 何国伟.腹膜前无张力修补术与传统疝修补对比研究[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014,8(2):135-137.
[7] 郑则宇.开放式腹膜前间隙和疝环充填式无张力腹股沟斜疝修补术140例对比观察[J].陕西医学杂志, 2014,43(5):583-585.
[8] 孙平,郑启昌,胡青钢,等.前入路腹膜前间隙疝修补术术中损伤12例分析[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2014,34(5):429-431.
[9] 聂彬,彭珂,王金波.超普疝装置腹膜前间隙与疝环充填式无张力疝修补的临床疗效比较[J].西部医学, 2014,26(7):879-880.
[10] 林庆民.腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝中的临床应用[J].微创医学, 2014,9(3):354-355.
[11] 崔磊,谢嵘,张清,等.腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术在治疗腹股沟疝中的临床价值分析[J].中国地方病防治杂志, 2014,29(S2):4.
[12] 项凯.腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补法治疗疝气的临床效果观察[J].实用中西医结合临床, 2015,15(10):76.
[13] 路来社,马锋.开放式腹膜前间隙修补术与疝环填充式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟斜疝的疗效分析[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015,9(6):503-505.
[14] 郭润田.腹膜前间隙无张力修补术治疗疝气的临床疗效探讨[J].转化医学电子杂志, 2015,2(10):100-101.
[15] 曾环洪,张繁疆,赖伟坚,等.前入路腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术在成人腹股沟疝中的应用[J].微创医学, 2015,10(6):764-766.
[16] 秦明.疝环充填式无张力修补术和腹膜前间隙修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝临床分析[J].河南外科学杂志, 2017,23(1):87.
[17] 卢奇志,金洲祥.疝环充填式与腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术疗效评估[J].浙江创伤外科, 2017,22(1):69-71.

Therapeutic effect of tension-free repair in preperitoneal space on inguinal hernia

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LU Geng. Comparative analysis on effects of TAPP and open mesh plug and flat plate tension-free hernia repair on inguinal hernia [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2021, 10(1): 17-18.
[2]	DA Bo, XU Wenhai. Clinical observation of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in treatment of adult inguinal hernia [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2021, 10(1): 19-21.
[3]	LIU Jianxin, WANG Zheng, LI Jian. Efficacy, surgical outcome, and prognosis of patients with lumbar disc herniation after modified foraminoplasty [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2020, 9(3): 166-169.
[4]	CHU Jianwei. Curative effect of improved LIFT surgery on anal fistula [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2020, 9(3): 177-179.
[5]	WU Weiwen, ZHEN Jiesheng, YUAN Chaojie, CHENG Jian. Efficacy comparison of two different flap free methods performed in endoscopic thyroidectomy [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2020, 9(1): 28-30.
[6]	LIU Hualiu. Efficacy and safety evaluation of percutaneous vertebroplasty in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2019, 8(4): 223-226.
[7]	LIU Xiaoming, HU Yaohua, TANG Shibin, LUO Zhiquan. Clinical study on reconstruction of metacarpophalangeal joint defect with semi-hook carpometacarpal joint surface transplantation [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2019, 8(4): 230-233.
[8]	SANG Hongyan, ZHANG Min. Effect of laparoscopic hernia repair on inguinal hernia [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2019, 8(4): 234-236.
[9]	LI Liu, YANG Xueying, LYU Yuhong. Application of WeChat platform in family nursing of elderly patients with hip fracture [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2019, 8(4): 291-294.
[10]	LI Yong. Clinical efficacy of comprehensive therapy in the treatment of early inflammatory intestinal obstruction after acute abdominal surgery [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2018, 7(4): 241-243.
[11]	CHEN Li, ZHANG Guobo. Clinical effects of laparoscopic indirect inguinal hernia repair in children [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2018, 7(3): 181-183.
[12]	ZHANG Yangyang, SHAN Lingtong, PU Yiwei, LI Wangying, YAO Zhijian, GE Wen. Comparison of thoracic and transabdominal approches for the treatment of esophageal hiatal hernia [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2017, 6(3): 165-168.
[13]	CAI Desheng, WU Ji. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of preperitoneal space tension-free hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal hernia [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2017, 6(2): 96-98.
[14]	ZHU Zhanqiu. Analysis on clinical effect of hardener injection combined with automatic ligation of hemorrhoids in the treatment of hemorrhoids [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2017, 6(2): 102-104.
[15]	. Under local anesthesia peritoneal clearance senile inguinal hernia repair straight before 48 cases treatment experience [J]. Surgical Research and New Technique, 2017, 6(1): 27-29.